Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compassion Satisfaction to Combat Work-Related Burnout, Vicarious Trauma, and Secondary Traumatic Stress

Cummings, Caroline, Singer, Jonathan, Hisaka, Ryan, Benuto, Lorraine T.·2021·Journal of Interpersonal Violence
DOI 10.1177/0886260518799502
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Helping professionals play an essential role in the recovery of victims of trauma. However, research has demonstrated that, as a result of their work, helping professionals’ indirect exposure to clients’ trauma increases the likelihood of experiencing negative psychological responses, including vicarious trauma (VT), secondary traumatic stress (STS), and burnout. The present study examined the concurrent validity between the STS subscale on the Professional Quality of Life (ProQoL) scale and the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS). Furthermore, the relationships between compassion satisfaction (CS) and burnout were investigated. Participants were recruited using a comprehensive web search of agencies across the United States that employed victim advocates, a subtype of helping professionals that are understudied. A list of possible agencies ( N = 75) was generated, and each agency was sent an email about the study. In total, 132 victim advocates provided data for these analyses. Findings revealed positive correlations between the STS subscale on the ProQoL and the STSS. In addition, a negative correlation was found between burnout and CS. Two-level hierarchical multiple regression analyses demonstrated that burnout accounted for 47.3% of the variance in STS, and CS contributed an additional 3.9%. Furthermore, burnout accounted 45.8% of the variance in VT, whereas CS contributed an additional 0.6%, indicating that burnout is a strong predictor of VT and STS, but CS may serve as a protective factor against experiencing both. Prevention and intervention efforts should target reducing burnout to combat these psychological sequelae and increasing CS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260518799502

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Benuto L. T., 2018, Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 1
  2. Dutton M.A., 1992, Empowering and healing the battered women
  3. Hayes M. W., 2013, Annals of Psychotherapy & Integrative Health, 16, 20
  4. Pearlman L. A., 2003, Trauma and Attachment Belief Scale
  5. Sprang G., 2011, Child Welfare, 90, 149

Cited by

See all 84

Metadata

Authors
Cummings, C., Singer, J., Hisaka, R., & Benuto, L. T.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno, USA
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2018-09-18
Volume
36
Issue
9-10
Pages
NP5304-NP5319
ISSN
  • 0886-2605
  • 1552-6518
DOI
10.1177/0886260518799502
Cited by
84
References
42
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.