Cited by 1,787Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Professional Development and MotivationStress and Burnout Research

Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations

Skaalvik, Einar M., Skaalvik, Sidsel·2010·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Skaalvik, Einar M.
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
1059-1069
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124093390
Cited by
1,787
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 156 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 163 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 33
FWCI
83.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
teacher self-efficacy, teacher burnout, collective teacher efficacy, teacher job satisfaction, school context, scale factor structure, primary school teachers, junior high school teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review