Cited by 404Fashion and Cultural TextilesConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorCultural History and Identity Formation

Dress and identity

Open access
Roach-Higgins, Mary Ellen, Eicher, Joanne B.·1992·Clothing and Textiles Research Journal

Abstract

Development of a theoretical framework for understanding linkages between identity and dress depends on careful selection and definition of terms and development of a broad, holistic view of Social Aspects of Dress. A comprehensive definition of dress includes both body modifications and supplements to the body. Properties of these modifications and supplements can be cross-classified with sensory responses they evoke. Because dress functions as an effective means of communication during social interaction, it influences peoples' establishing identities of themselves and others. An individual's self incorporates identities based on assigned and achieved positions within social structures, especially those that organize kinship, economic, religious, and political activities. Identities communicated by dress are also influenced by technology and society-wide moral and aesthetic standards for dress. Specific types and properties of dress that communicate identity may change through time in response to economic, demographic, and other societal changes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0887302x9201000401

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fitting in with one's social group and with society at large requires adopting dress and appearance that correspond to prevailing social norms.

    “Scholars of fashion note that fitting in with one’s social group and with society at large requires adopting dress and appearance that correspond to prevailing social norms [56].”

    From When the times get tough the toughs get funny: Means by which humor buffers against death anxiety emerged during COVID-19 outbreak (2022) · cites this paper as [56]

    In “The Social Perspective” (page unavailable), the paper says dress that matches others’ expectations can lead to satisfactory social interaction, while a mismatch may make interaction difficult; it gives the example of expected interview attire. This supports the role of dress norms in social acceptance, but not the stronger claim that fitting in with a group or society at large requires conforming to prevailing norms in all cases. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. DeLong, M. R. (1987). The way we look: A frameworkfor visual analysis of dress. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
  2. Eicher, J. B., & Roach-Higgins, M. E. (in press). Describ- ing dress: A system for classifying and defining. In R. Barnes & J. B. Eicher (Eds.), Dress and gender: Mak- ing and meaning in cultural context. Oxford, En- gland : Berg.
  3. Stone, G. P. (1962). Appearance and the self. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and the social processes: An interactionist approach (pp. 86-118). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  4. Sybers, R., & Roach, M. E. (1962). Clothing and human behavior. Journal of Home Economics, 54(3), 184-187.
  5. Anspach, K. (1967). The why of fashion. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
  6. Gurel, L. M., & Beeson, M. S. ( 1979). Dimensions of dress and adornment: A book of readings (3rd ed). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt. ( 1 st edition, 1975)
  7. Horn, M. J., & Gurel, L. M. (1981). The second skin: An interdisciplinary study of clothing (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (lst edition, 1968)
  8. Kaiser, S. B. (1990). The social psychology of clothing and personal adornment (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan. ( 1 st edition, 1985)
  9. Roach, M. E., & Eicher, J. B. (1965). Dress, adornment and the social order. New York. John Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roach-Higgins, M. E., & Eicher, J. B.
Affiliations
  • 12 Pin Oak Trail, Madison, WI 53717
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
Published
1992-06
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0887-302X (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-2473
OpenAlex
W4205402545
Cited by
404
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
FWCI
36.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clothing and Textiles Research Journal (publishedVersion)
  • University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stryker
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Fashion and Cultural Textiles
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Cultural History and Identity Formation
Keywords
clothing, identity, body modification, sensory responses, nonverbal communication, social identity, social change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review