Cited by 39Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Nutrition and HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Psychosocial predictors of primiparous breastfeeding initiation and duration

Open access
Mathews, Meagan E., Leerkes, Esther M., Lovelady, Cheryl A., Labban, Jeffrey D.·2014·Journal of Human Lactation

Abstract

Background: Many US women fall short of meeting the recommendations on breastfeeding. Whereas prenatal demographic factors have been well researched in relation to breastfeeding, psychosocial maternal characteristics are less understood but could be important predictors of breastfeeding initiation and duration. Objective: This study examined primiparous maternal psychosocial characteristics and temperamentally based negative infant affect as predictors of breastfeeding initiation and duration while accounting for depression and sociodemographic covariates. Methods: Prenatally, 237 primiparous women were administered the Adult Attachment Interview and completed a measure of beliefs related to infant crying. At 6 months postpartum, negative infant affect was assessed via mother report. Breastfeeding was assessed at 6 months and 1 year postpartum via mother report. Results: Results indicated that younger, low income, less educated, single, ethnic minority mothers and mothers with elevated depressive symptoms were less likely to initiate breastfeeding and breastfed for a shorter period than other women. Women who initiated breastfeeding tended to have higher adult attachment coherence scores (more secure attachment) than those who did not initiate breastfeeding (median score of 6.00 vs 4.00). An interaction was observed between negative infant affect and beliefs about crying related to spoiling, such that earlier cessation of breastfeeding was observed among mothers who reported high levels of negative infant affect and strongly endorsed the belief that responding to cries spoils infants (hazard ratio = 1.71, P < .01). Conclusion: Although these psychosocial variables predicted relatively little variation in breastfeeding over and above covariates, the results suggest some novel approaches to promote breastfeeding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0890334414537707

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The initiation and duration of breastfeeding is negatively affected by the existence of mental health disorders in women.

    “At the same time, as it has been proven that the initiation and duration of breastfeeding is negatively affected by the existence of mental health disorders in women [18,19,20,21]”

    From Association between Breastfeeding Duration and Long-Term Midwifery-Led Support and Psychosocial Support: Outcomes from a Greek Non-Randomized Controlled Perinatal Health Intervention (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Abstract’s Results report that mothers with elevated depressive symptoms were less likely to initiate breastfeeding and breastfed for a shorter period. The Methods’ Potential Covariates section says the study measured depressive symptoms, not diagnosed mental health disorders; its observational finding also does not establish that those symptoms caused the breastfeeding outcomes. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathews, M. E., Leerkes, E. M., Lovelady, C. A., & Labban, J. D.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Venue
Journal of Human Lactation
Published
2014-06-17
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
480-487
ISSN
  • 0890-3344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5732
OpenAlex
W2059805680
Cited by
39
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Human Lactation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD058578)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
breastfeeding initiation, breastfeeding duration, primiparous women, adult attachment, maternal depression, sociodemographic factors, breastfeeding cessation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Breast Feeding, Female, Humans, Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, North Carolina, Parity, Pregnancy, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Depression, Postpartum, Postpartum Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review