Cited by 42Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Nutrition and HealthInfant Development and Preterm Care

Relationship between the Infant Feeding Preferences of Chinese Mothers’ Immediate Social Network and Early Breastfeeding Cessation

Bai, Dorothy Li, Fong, Daniel Yee Tak, Lok, Kris Yuet Wan, Tarrant, Marie·2016·Journal of Human Lactation

Abstract

Background The relationship between support from members of a mother's social network and breastfeeding continuation is receiving increased attention. Objectives The objectives of this study were to describe the infant feeding preferences of Chinese mothers' immediate social network and to examine the association between these preferences and early breastfeeding cessation. Methods In total, 1172 mother-infant pairs were recruited from 4 public hospitals in Hong Kong and followed prospectively for 12 months or until breastfeeding stopped. Results Over 40% of participants' partners preferred breastfeeding and half had no infant feeding preference. Only about 20% of participants' mothers or mothers-in-law preferred breastfeeding, and less than 10% reported that all of the 3 significant family members (partner, mother, and mother-in-law) preferred breastfeeding. The partner's preference for infant formula or mixed feeding (odds ratio [OR], 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-4.71) or having no preference (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.16-2.30) was strongly associated with higher odds of stopping breastfeeding before 1 month. For every additional family member who preferred breastfeeding, the odds of stopping breastfeeding was reduced by almost 20% (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.97). However, living with a parent-in-law (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.02-2.07) was also a predictor of early breastfeeding cessation. Knowing someone who had breastfed for ≥ 1 month (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.97) or having…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0890334416630537

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bai, D. L., Fong, D. Y. T., Lok, K. Y. W., & Tarrant, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
Corresponding author
Bai, Dorothy Li
Venue
Journal of Human Lactation
Published
2016-02-17
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
301-308
ISSN
  • 0890-3344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5732
OpenAlex
W2336616081
Cited by
42
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Lactation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
breastfeeding cessation, social networks, family support, mate preferences, mother-in-law, breastfeeding education, Chinese mothers, Hong Kong
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Breast Feeding, China, Family Relations, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hong Kong, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Behavior, Prospective Studies, Social Support, Time Factors, Asian People, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review