Cited by 50Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsBreastfeeding Practices and Influences

The Role of Staphylococcus aureus in Mastitis: A Multidisciplinary Working Group Experience

Open access
Rimoldi, Sara Giordana, Pileri, Paola, Mazzocco, Martina Ilaria, Romeri, Francesca, Bestetti, Giovanna, Calvagna, Nunziata, Tonielli, Claudia, Fiori, Lorenza +7 more·2020·Journal of Human Lactation

Abstract

Background: Breastfeeding women are at risk of developing mastitis during the lactation period. Staphylococcus aureus has emerged as the community-acquired pathogen responsible for virulence (methicillin resistance and Panton-Valentine leukocidin toxin producing). Research aim: The aim was to compare the microorganisms responsible for mastitis and breast abscesses during breastfeeding. Methods: This observational study was conducted with a sample of women ( N = 60) admitted to our hospital between 2016 and 2018. Participants affected by mastitis and breast abscess were studied and cared for by a multidisciplinary working group. A diagnostic breast ultrasound identified the pathology. Results: Twenty-six participants (43.3%) were affected by mastitis and 34 (56.7%) by breast abscess. The most common microorganism identified was Staphylococcus aureus ( S. aureus; mastitis, n = 13; abscesses, n = 24). Methicillin resistance was identified in 21 (44.7%) S. aureus strains: 17 (80.9%) cases of abscess and four (19.1%) cases of mastitis. The median number of months of breastfeeding was smaller in the methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) cases (median = 3, range = 1–20 months) than in the methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) cases (median = 6.5, range = 3–21 months). The Panton-Valentine leukocidin toxin gene was detected in 12 (25.5%) cases (MRSA, n = 8, 66.7%; MSSA, n = 4, 33.3%). Hospitalization was required more frequently in MRSA ( n = 8, 38%; five Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive) than in MSSA cases ( n = 5, 19%; one Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive). Four women out of the eight MRSA cases (50%) that were Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive stopped breastfeeding during mammary pathologies, three (37.5%) participants continued breastfeeding until the follow-up recall, and one case was lost at follow-up. Conclusion: Clinical severity was probably complicated by the presence of the Panton-Valentine leukocidin toxin, which required hospitalization more frequently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0890334419876272

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recent years, the detection rate of MRSA in the breast milk and pus of lactating patients has gradually increased.

    “In recent years, the detection rate of MRSA in the breast milk and pus of lactating patients has gradually increased [2, 3, 5].”

    From Clinical characteristics of lactational breast abscess caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: hospital-based study in China (2021) · cites this paper as [5]

    The indexed copy provides repository metadata and a PDF link, but no passage from the paper discussing MRSA detection rates. Searches for MRSA, breast milk, pus, and increasing incidence did not find evidence for the claimed trend. The claim cannot be assessed from the available text. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Rimoldi, S. G., Pileri, P., Mazzocco, M. I., Romeri, F., Bestetti, G., Calvagna, N., Tonielli, C., Fiori, L., Gigantiello, A., Pagani, C., Magistrelli, P., Sartani, A., De Silvestri, A., Gismondo, M. R., & Cetin, I.
Affiliations
  • ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Corresponding author
Rimoldi, Sara Giordana
Venue
Journal of Human Lactation
Published
2019-10-08
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
503-509
ISSN
  • 0890-3344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5732
OpenAlex
W2979799851
Cited by
50
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Human Lactation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Keywords
mastitis, breast abscess, breastfeeding, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Panton-Valentine leukocidin, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, lactation, hospitalization, breastfeeding duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Breast Feeding, Female, Humans, Italy, Longitudinal Studies, Mastitis, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review