The Role of Staphylococcus aureus in Mastitis: A Multidisciplinary Working Group Experience
Open accessAbstract
Background: Breastfeeding women are at risk of developing mastitis during the lactation period. Staphylococcus aureus has emerged as the community-acquired pathogen responsible for virulence (methicillin resistance and Panton-Valentine leukocidin toxin producing). Research aim: The aim was to compare the microorganisms responsible for mastitis and breast abscesses during breastfeeding. Methods: This observational study was conducted with a sample of women ( N = 60) admitted to our hospital between 2016 and 2018. Participants affected by mastitis and breast abscess were studied and cared for by a multidisciplinary working group. A diagnostic breast ultrasound identified the pathology. Results: Twenty-six participants (43.3%) were affected by mastitis and 34 (56.7%) by breast abscess. The most common microorganism identified was Staphylococcus aureus ( S. aureus; mastitis, n = 13; abscesses, n = 24). Methicillin resistance was identified in 21 (44.7%) S. aureus strains: 17 (80.9%) cases of abscess and four (19.1%) cases of mastitis. The median number of months of breastfeeding was smaller in the methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) cases (median = 3, range = 1–20 months) than in the methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) cases (median = 6.5, range = 3–21 months). The Panton-Valentine leukocidin toxin gene was detected in 12 (25.5%) cases (MRSA, n = 8, 66.7%; MSSA, n = 4, 33.3%). Hospitalization was required more frequently in MRSA ( n = 8, 38%; five Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive) than in MSSA cases ( n = 5, 19%; one Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive). Four women out of the eight MRSA cases (50%) that were Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive stopped breastfeeding during mammary pathologies, three (37.5%) participants continued breastfeeding until the follow-up recall, and one case was lost at follow-up. Conclusion: Clinical severity was probably complicated by the presence of the Panton-Valentine leukocidin toxin, which required hospitalization more frequently.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In recent years, the detection rate of MRSA in the breast milk and pus of lactating patients has gradually increased.
“In recent years, the detection rate of MRSA in the breast milk and pus of lactating patients has gradually increased [2, 3, 5].”
From Clinical characteristics of lactational breast abscess caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: hospital-based study in China (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
The indexed copy provides repository metadata and a PDF link, but no passage from the paper discussing MRSA detection rates. Searches for MRSA, breast milk, pus, and increasing incidence did not find evidence for the claimed trend. The claim cannot be assessed from the available text. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ABM Clinical Protocol #4: Mastitis, Revised March 2014
Amir, L. H., & The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee (2014) · Breastfeeding Medicine · doi:10.1089/bfm.2014.9984 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, Y., Ma, X.-J., & He, X.-P. (2021) · International Breastfeeding Journal · doi:10.1186/s13006-021-00429-6 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Ding, S.-T., He, X.-P., Ma, X.-J., Zhang, Y., Liu, X.-X., & Qin, J. (2020) · Breastfeeding Medicine · doi:10.1089/bfm.2020.0003 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rimoldi, S. G., Pileri, P., Mazzocco, M. I., Romeri, F., Bestetti, G., Calvagna, N., Tonielli, C., Fiori, L., Gigantiello, A., Pagani, C., Magistrelli, P., Sartani, A., De Silvestri, A., Gismondo, M. R., & Cetin, I.
- Affiliations
- ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco (IT)
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Corresponding author
- Rimoldi, Sara Giordana
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Human Lactation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-10-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 503-509
- ISSN
- 0890-3344 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5732
- OpenAlex
- W2979799851
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Human Lactation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
- Keywords
- mastitis, breast abscess, breastfeeding, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Panton-Valentine leukocidin, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, lactation, hospitalization, breastfeeding duration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Breast Feeding, Female, Humans, Italy, Longitudinal Studies, Mastitis, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review