Becoming a “Trusted Outsider”: Gender, Ethnicity, and Inequality in Ethnographic Research
Abstract
It is commonly assumed that successful ethnographers strive for insider status and avoid being regarded as an outsider. Very often and especially within criminology, an ethnographer’s ability to gain the trust of research participants is linked to his or her degree of similarity to them, particularly with respect to gender. By describing the research dynamics between an all-male group of second-generation immigrants in Frankfurt/Germany, the “gatekeepers” and myself—a female researcher of different socioeconomic and ethnic background—I suggest that being an outsider in general and a female in particular is not a liability one necessarily needs to overcome. I propose that achieving status as an outsider trusted with “inside knowledge” may provide the ethnographer with a different perspective and different data than that potentially afforded by insider status.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many researchers from the sample considered an outsider positionality to be impartial and unbiased, a perspective supported by previous literature.
“Many researchers from the sample considered an outsider positionality to be 'impartial' and 'unbiased,' a perspective supported by previous literature (Bucerius, 2013; Chavez, 2015).”
From Insider/outsider dynamics: a reflexive thematic analysis of reflexivity/positionality in the <i>‘qualitative research in psychology’</i> journal (2025) · cites this paper as Bucerius, 2013
Cites
Lee, R. (1995) · doi:10.4135/9781412983839 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strunel, A.-M., & Cordoba, S. (2025) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2025.2505460 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Karimi, A. (2020) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/soin.12316 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Context of Racialized Assimilation: A Case of Second-Generation Somali-Canadians
Karimi, A., Thompson, S., & Bucerius, S. (2023) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2022.2100223 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bucerius, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bucerius, Sandra Meike
- Venue
- Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-09-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 690-721
- ISSN
- 0098-3039 (ISSN-L)
- 0891-2416
- 1552-5414
- OpenAlex
- W2033312706
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 18.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Contemporary Ethnography (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Keywords
- insider and outsider status, immigrant children, gatekeepers, insider status, ethnographic perspective, criminology research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review