Cited by 170Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsAnthropology: Ethics, History, CultureFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Becoming a “Trusted Outsider”: Gender, Ethnicity, and Inequality in Ethnographic Research

Bucerius, Sandra Meike·2013·Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that successful ethnographers strive for insider status and avoid being regarded as an outsider. Very often and especially within criminology, an ethnographer’s ability to gain the trust of research participants is linked to his or her degree of similarity to them, particularly with respect to gender. By describing the research dynamics between an all-male group of second-generation immigrants in Frankfurt/Germany, the “gatekeepers” and myself—a female researcher of different socioeconomic and ethnic background—I suggest that being an outsider in general and a female in particular is not a liability one necessarily needs to overcome. I propose that achieving status as an outsider trusted with “inside knowledge” may provide the ethnographer with a different perspective and different data than that potentially afforded by insider status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0891241613497747

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bucerius, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Bucerius, Sandra Meike
Venue
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
Published
2013-09-05
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
690-721
ISSN
  • 0098-3039 (ISSN-L)
  • 0891-2416
  • 1552-5414
OpenAlex
W2033312706
Cited by
170
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6
FWCI
18.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
insider and outsider status, immigrant children, gatekeepers, insider status, ethnographic perspective, criminology research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review