CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 244Family Dynamics and RelationshipsGender and Feminist StudiesHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Is This What Motherhood is All About?”: Weaving Experiences and Discourse through Transition to First-Time Motherhood

Miller, Tina·2007·Gender & Society
DOI 10.1177/0891243207300561
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article focuses on transition to first-time motherhood and explores the experiences of a group of women as they anticipate, give birth, and engage in early mothering. It illuminates how these women draw on, weave together, and challenge dominant strands of discourse that circumscribe their journeys into motherhood. Using qualitative longitudinal data, prenatal and postnatal episodes of transition are explored. The analysis and juxtaposing of these data reveal the different ways women anticipate and gradually make sense of becoming mothers. While there is a disjuncture between expectations and experiences for these new mothers, this article draws attention to the different ways women discursively position themselves through transition. It reveals how birth experiences can act as a discursive turning point and underscores the obduracy of some strands of dominant discourse. These findings contribute to a subtler and more nuanced understanding of the dynamic interplay between personal experience and gendered discourses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0891243207300561

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Andrews, M., 2000, Introduction
  2. Beck-Gernsheim, Elizabeth., 1996, Risk and the self: Encounters and responses
  3. Collins, Patricia Hill., 1994, Shifting the centre: Race, class and feminist theorising about motherhood
  4. Cosslett, Tess., 1994, Women and writing childbirth. Manchester, UK
  5. Lupton, Deborah., 1999, Risk

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 244

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Miller, T.
Affiliations
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Corresponding author
Miller, Tina
ORCID
Miller, Tina
Venue
Gender & Society
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2007-06
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
337-358
ISSN
  • 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3977
DOI
10.1177/0891243207300561
OpenAlex
W2119437676
Cited by
244
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
15.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Gender & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Keywords
first-time motherhood, transition to motherhood, childbirth experience, prenatal experience, postnatal experience, gender discourse, maternal identity, motherhood discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review