The Lavender Scare in Homonormative Times: Policing, Hyper-incarceration, and LGBTQ Youth Homelessness
Abstract
Scholars have identified policing and hyper-incarceration as key mechanisms to reproduce racial inequality and poverty. Existing research, however, often overlooks how policing practices impact gender and sexuality, especially expansive expressions of gender and non-heterosexuality. This lack of attention is critical because lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people disproportionately experience incarceration, including LGBTQ youth who are disproportionately incarcerated in juvenile detention. In this article, I draw on 18 months of ethnographic fieldwork and 40 in-depth interviews with LGBTQ youth experiencing homelessness to address this gap in the literature by documenting how police and other agents of the state use their discretion to regulate youth’s gender expressions, identities, and sex lives. I posit that current policing patterns of discrimination operate primarily not through de jure discrimination against LGBTQ people but as de facto discrimination based on discretionary hyper-incarceration practices that police gender, sexuality, and LGBTQ people. I contend that policing is not only about maintaining racial inequality and governing poverty but also about controlling and regulating gender and sexuality, especially the gender and sexuality of poor LGBTQ people of color.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The current climate is one of violence and political backlash against trans people.
“especially given the current climate of violence and political backlash against trans people [71, 84].”
From Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
The world is increasingly violent for trans people.
“In an increasingly violent world for trans people, we draw on our theorizing to build recommendations for more inclusive and safer OSS projects for contributors.”
From Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
Cites
Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?
Cohen, C. J. (1997) · GLQ · doi:10.1215/10642684-3-4-437 · Cited by 2,140 · see citing works
Down, Out, and Under Arrest: Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row
Stuart, F. (2016) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226370958.001.0001 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software
Frluckaj, H., Stevens, N., Howison, J., & Dabbish, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3687047 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Robinson, B. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Corresponding author
- Robinson, Brandon Andrew
- Venue
- Gender & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-03-19
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 210-232
- ISSN
- 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3977
- OpenAlex
- W3010754984
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gender & Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (#1636536)
- Equality Knowledge Project Grant
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Keywords
- Lavender Scare, policing, juvenile detention, police discretion, gender expression, sexuality, homonormativity, LGBTQ people of color, racial inequality, poverty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review