Cited by 64Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisPolicing Practices and PerceptionsLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

The Lavender Scare in Homonormative Times: Policing, Hyper-incarceration, and LGBTQ Youth Homelessness

Robinson, Brandon Andrew·2020·Gender & Society

Abstract

Scholars have identified policing and hyper-incarceration as key mechanisms to reproduce racial inequality and poverty. Existing research, however, often overlooks how policing practices impact gender and sexuality, especially expansive expressions of gender and non-heterosexuality. This lack of attention is critical because lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people disproportionately experience incarceration, including LGBTQ youth who are disproportionately incarcerated in juvenile detention. In this article, I draw on 18 months of ethnographic fieldwork and 40 in-depth interviews with LGBTQ youth experiencing homelessness to address this gap in the literature by documenting how police and other agents of the state use their discretion to regulate youth’s gender expressions, identities, and sex lives. I posit that current policing patterns of discrimination operate primarily not through de jure discrimination against LGBTQ people but as de facto discrimination based on discretionary hyper-incarceration practices that police gender, sexuality, and LGBTQ people. I contend that policing is not only about maintaining racial inequality and governing poverty but also about controlling and regulating gender and sexuality, especially the gender and sexuality of poor LGBTQ people of color.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0891243220906172

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current climate is one of violence and political backlash against trans people.

    “especially given the current climate of violence and political backlash against trans people [71, 84].”
  • The world is increasingly violent for trans people.

    “In an increasingly violent world for trans people, we draw on our theorizing to build recommendations for more inclusive and safer OSS projects for contributors.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, B. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Brandon Andrew
Venue
Gender & Society
Published
2020-03-19
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
210-232
ISSN
  • 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3977
OpenAlex
W3010754984
Cited by
64
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Gender & Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (#1636536)
  • Equality Knowledge Project Grant
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
Lavender Scare, policing, juvenile detention, police discretion, gender expression, sexuality, homonormativity, LGBTQ people of color, racial inequality, poverty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review