The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of Apolipoproteins E4 and C1 With Onset Age and Memory: A Study of Sporadic Alzheimer Disease in Taiwan
Abstract
Objective: To identify clinical manifestations and neuropsychological effects of Alzheimer disease (AD) in apolipoprotein (ApoE) e4 carriers and to investigate the relationships between ApoE HhaI polymorphism and apolipoprotein C1 (APOC1) HpaI polymorphism in Taiwanese patients with AD. Participants and methods: A total of 127 patients with AD and 191 elderly individuals were screened for ApoE and APOC1 polymorphism. All patients underwent neuropsychological testing, including a Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), and/or the Visual Association Memory Test (VAMT) with Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument. Results: The frequencies of the e4 and A alleles were significantly higher in the AD group. In the patients with AD, the e4 and A allele effects on those with an age-of-onset of 60 to 79 years were stronger than those with an age-of-onset of 80 years or higher. Visual Association Memory Test performance was significantly worse in e4-allele carriers but not in A-allele carriers, in the early AD, particularly in those affected with AD for less than 2 years. Although there was no statistically significant difference in genotypic frequency between patients and controls, the 2 genes were linked. In addition, the presence of the AA genotype concomitant with the e4 allele may be better associated with AD diagnosis than either factor alone. Conclusion: We conclude that the e4 allele affects neuropsychological performance and illness morbidity. Concomitantly, ApoE e4 and APOC1 A alleles have a better association with AD than ApoE e4 alone. In addition, APOC1 may partially contribute to the pathogenesis of AD, but the nature of its relationship with e4 requires further investigation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The co-presence of APOE ε4 and APOC1 risk alleles has been reported to be more strongly associated with AD than APOE ε4 alone, indicating that the interaction between these two genes may contribute to the development of AD and cognitive decline.
“The co-presence of APOE ε4 and APOC1 risk alleles has been reported to be more strongly associated with AD than APOE ε4 alone, indicating that the interaction between these two genes may contribute to the development of AD and cognitive decline [96].”
From Association of APOC1 with cortical atrophy during conversion to Alzheimer’s disease (2025) · cites this paper as [96]
Citations
Cites
Campion, D., Dumanchin, C., Hannequin, D., Dubois, B., Belliard, S., Puel, M., Thomas-Anterion, C., Michon, A., Martin, C., Charbonnier, F., et al. (1999) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302553 · Cited by 785
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)68638-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s100480100122 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00193.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033291700027914 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.73.2.126 · DOI
- Chuang WL, 2006, Acta Neurol Taiwan, 15, 98
- 10.1007/s00702-005-0424-z · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/18.11.3428-a · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.43.8.1467 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.410370217 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.46.6.1749 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.57.11.1414 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)33338-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02559-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00041444-200109000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- Xu PT, 2006, Neurobiol Dis, 21, 156
- 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1186/1741-7015-4-1 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.44.8.1513 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.410360429 · DOI
- Murman DL, 1996, Dementia, 7, 251
- 10.1212/01.WNL.0000137041.86153.42 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.010 · DOI
- 10.1038/12137 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-17-06748.2003 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:6<594::AID-HIPO2>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
- 10.1007/s12149-007-0148-2 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022409617539 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.51.1.131 · DOI
- 10.1097/00041444-200109000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M203151200 · DOI
- 10.1385/JMN:23:3:225 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55263-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0441 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tzeng, N.-S., Chung, C.-H., Lin, F.-H., Chiang, C.-P., Yeh, C.-B., Huang, S.-Y., Lu, R.-B., Chang, H.-A., Kao, Y.-C., Yeh, H.-W., et al. (2018) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-018-0611-x · Cited by 356
Bae, J., Logan, P. E., Acri, D. J., Bharthur, A., Nho, K., Saykin, A. J., Risacher, S. L., Nudelman, K., Polsinelli, A. J., Pentchev, V., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13319 · Cited by 14
Association of APOC1 with cortical atrophy during conversion to Alzheimer’s disease
Oh, S., Kim, S., Kim, J. P., Seo, S. W., Park, B.-Y., & Park, H. (2025) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-025-01695-6 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Chuang, W.-L., Hsieh, Y.-C., Wang, C.-Y., Kuo, H.-C., & Huang, C.-C.
- Affiliations
- Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University, Taipei, Taiwan,
- Venue
- Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-48
- ISSN
- 0891-9887
- 1552-5708
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review