The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Promoting Inquiry-Based Instructional Practice: The Longitudinal Impact of Professional Development in the Context of Systemic Reform
Abstract
Over the past decade, national and state policy makers have wagered heavily on systemically reforming science and mathematics education through inquiry-based instructional approaches. This study examines the impact in one state of intensive science and mathematics professional development for teachers in the context of statewide systemic reform. Based on a unique longitudinal data set, the study models the impact of professional development on teachers' attitudes toward inquiry-based instruction, their capacity to adopt inquiry-based teaching strategies, and their classroom use of inquiry-based instructional practices. The findings are remarkably consistent across both subjects. Teachers' attitudes, preparation, and practices all showed strong, positive, and significant growth from preprofessionai development to the following spring. Furthermore, these gains were sustained over several years following their involvement. These findings provide a promising indication that large-scale, high-quality, intensive training set within a context of standards-based systemic reform can be a powerful mechanism for sustained impact on teachers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effective Teacher Professional Development
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017) · Learning Policy Institute · doi:10.54300/122.311 · Cited by 4,264
Inquiry‐based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R. T. (2004) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20039 · Cited by 385
Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections
Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.006 · Cited by 336
Pathways to New Accountability Through the Every Student Succeeds Act
Darling-Hammond, L., Bae, S., Cook-Harvey, C., Lam, L., Mercer, C., Podolsky, A., & Stosich, E. L. (2016) · Learning Policy Institute · doi:10.54300/966.414 · Cited by 127
Correnti, R. (2007) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373707309074 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Supovitz, J. A., Mayer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B.
- Venue
- Educational Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-356
- ISSN
- 0895-9048 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3896
- OpenAlex
- W2004747207
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Promoting Inquiry-Based Instructional Practice: The Longitudinal Impact of Professional Development in the Context of Systemic Reform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0895904800014003001
- The paper
- Supovitz, J. A., Mayer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting Inquiry-Based Instructional Practice: The Longitudinal Impact of Professional Development in the Context of Systemic Reform. Educational Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904800014003001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.