Cited by 14Pharmacy and Medical PracticesMedication Adherence and CompliancePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Adherence to Amiodarone Monitoring Recommendations Before and After Implementation of a Centralized Pharmacy Service: A Cohort Study

Johnson, Samuel G., Canty, Kara, Billups, Sarah, Schimmer, Jennifer·2010·Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether patients enrolled in a centralized amiodarone monitoring service (AMS) were more adherent to amiodarone surveillance and whether the incidence of amiodarone-related toxicity differed for patients who were enrolled in the AMS. Amiodarone therapy was initiated in 917 patients in an integrated health care delivery system between October 1998 and December 2006. Electronic records were queried to establish the proportion of patients completing recommended amiodarone monitoring during the first year of therapy; specifically, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), electrocardiogram (ECG), and chest radiograph (CXR). Patients were assigned to the AMS or control cohort based on when amiodarone was initiated. Patients assigned to the AMS cohort were more likely to receive ALT monitoring at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year (68% vs 44%, P < .001; 86% vs 76%, P = .002; 84% vs 69%, P < .001; respectively) and ECG monitoring at baseline and 1 year (76% vs 58%; 96% vs 75%, P < .001, respectively). There was no difference in TSH monitoring at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year (55% vs 49%, P = not significant [NS]; 74% vs 70%, P = NS; 68% vs 64%, P = NS; respectively).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0897190009358770

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, S. G., Canty, K., Billups, S., & Schimmer, J.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Samuel G.
Venue
Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Published
2010-04-14
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
536-539
ISSN
  • 0897-1900 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-1937
OpenAlex
W2062260138
Cited by
14
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacy Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
amiodarone, drug monitoring, medication adherence, amiodarone toxicity, ECG monitoring, chest radiograph, adverse drug reactions, anticoagulation monitoring
MeSH terms
Aged, Alanine Transaminase, Ambulatory Care, Amiodarone, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Cardiology, Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Pharmaceutical Services, Thyrotropin, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Drug Monitoring, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review