The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Management as Political Sustainability
Abstract
Grounded in critical theory and the Gramscian concept of hegemony, this article argues that environmental management (EM) can be understood as an accommodation to growing public awareness of environmental problems that potentially threatens dominant hegemonic coalitions. On the material level, EM is a set of practices that ameliorates the more egregious environmental consequences of industrialproduction; on the ideological and symbolic level, EM constructs products and companies as "green " and legitimizes the primacy of corporate management's role in addressing environmental problemrs. EM is thus seen to be more about political than environmental sustainability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Porter, M. E. (1991) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168 · Cited by 1,540
Cited by
Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting
Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003 · Cited by 1,066
Planetary Boundaries: Ecological Foundations for Corporate Sustainability
Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01073.x · Cited by 867
Who Sustains Whose Development? Sustainable Development and the Reinvention of Nature
Banerjee, S. B. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024001341 · Cited by 785
An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual
Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0718 · Cited by 722
Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992-Present: A Review
Etzion, D. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206307302553 · Cited by 630
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, D. L.
- Venue
- Organization & Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126-147
- ISSN
- 1086-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7417
- OpenAlex
- W2149445353
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Management as Political Sustainability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0921810697102002
- The paper
- Levy, D. L. (1997). Environmental Management as Political Sustainability. Organization & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921810697102002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.