Cited by 746Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesLabor Movements and Unions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Riders on the Storm: Workplace Solidarity among Gig Economy Couriers in Italy and the UK

Open access
Tassinari, Arianna, Maccarrone, Vincenzo·2020·Work, Employment and Society

Abstract

In light of the individualisation, dispersal and pervasive monitoring that characterise work in the ‘gig economy’, the development of solidarity among gig workers could be expected to be unlikely. However, numerous recent episodes of gig workers’ mobilisation require reconsideration of these assumptions. This article contributes to the debate about potentials and obstacles for solidarity in the changing world of work by showing the processes through which workplace solidarity among gig workers developed in two cases of mobilisation of food delivery platform couriers in the UK and Italy. Through the framework of labour process theory, the article identifies the sources of antagonism in the app-mediated model of work organisation and the factors that facilitated and hindered the consolidation of active solidarity and the emergence of collective action among gig workers. The article emphasises the centrality of workers’ agential practices in overcoming constraints to solidarity and collective action, and the diversity of forms through which solidarity can be expressed in hostile work contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0950017019862954

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1057/9780230281622 · DOI
  2. Bild T, Madsen M, Jorgensen H, et al. (1997) Wage earner solidarity: moribund or changing? In: D’Art D, Turner T (eds) Collectivism and Individualism: Trends and Prospects. Dublin: Oak Tree Press, 11–33.
  3. 10.14452/MR-026-03-1974-07_1 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Broughton A, Gloster R, Marvell R, et al. (2018) The Experiences of Individuals in the Gig Economy. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
  5. Cohen S (1987) A labour process to nowhere? New Left Review I/165: 34–50. · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0143831X02231002 · DOI
  7. De Stefano V (2016) Introduction: crowdsourcing, the gig-economy and the law. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3): 461–470.
  8. 10.1353/sof.2004.0107 · DOI
  9. Fantasia R (1988) Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action, and Contemporary American Workers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  10. 10.1177/0018726718790002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1177/107780040100700305 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/0730888497024004003 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/2095908 · DOI
  14. Huws U, Spencer N, Syrdal D, et al. (2017) Work in the European Gig Economy. Brussels: Foundation for European Progressive Studies.
  15. 10.4337/9781035377732.00011 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00391.x · DOI
  17. 10.3224/indbez.v25i4.06 · DOI
  18. 10.1057/978-1-137-48087-3_4 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/030981689706200104 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719571.003.0018 · DOI
  21. Moore PV, Upchurch M, Whittaker X (2017) Humans and Machines at Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  22. 10.1177/0950017004048691 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2013.00882.x · DOI
  24. 10.1023/A:1006941408302 · DOI
  25. Scholz T (2017) Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital Economy. Malden, MA: Polity.
  26. 10.1177/1461444817738236 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1177/0309816811430840 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/0143831X13501000 · DOI
  29. Snow DA, Benford R (1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research 1: 197–217.
  30. Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanich College Publisher.
  31. Stjernø S (2004) Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. 10.1177/1024258917713846 · DOI
  33. Tassinari A, Maccarrone V (2018) Le mobilitazioni dei fattorini della gig economy in Italia: forme organizzative e implicazioni per la rappresentanza. Quaderni di Rassegna Sindacale: Lavori 2, 75–90.
  34. 10.1177/0950017010384546 · DOI
  35. Touraine A, Wieviorka M, Dubet F (1987) The Workers’ Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  36. 10.1007/BF01124165 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1177/0950017019836911. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Waters F, Woodcock J (2017) Far from seamless: a workers’ inquiry at Deliveroo. Viewpoint Magazine, 20 September. Available at: https://www.viewpointmag.com/2017/09/20/far-seamless-workers-inquiry-deliveroo/ (accessed 8 November 2018).
  40. 10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00275.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1111/ntwe.12112 · DOI
  42. Yin RK (2013) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE. Beverly Hills, CA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Tassinari, Arianna
Venue
Work, Employment and Society
Published
2019-07-26
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
35-54
ISSN
  • 0950-0170 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8722
OpenAlex
W2966058192
Cited by
746
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 2
FWCI
124.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Work Employment and Society (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Università degli Studi di Milano
  • University of Warwick (ES/J500203/1)
  • King's College London
  • Irish Research Council
  • Université de Lyon
  • Economic and Social Research Council (J500203/1, ES/J500203/1, J500203)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Labor Movements and Unions
Keywords
gig economy, workplace solidarity, collective action, labour process theory, workers' mobilization, worker agency, precarious employment, Italy, United Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review