Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 122Political Economy and MarxismManagement Theory and PracticeLabor Movements and Unions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Management, Labour Process and Agency

Armstrong, Peter·1989·Work, Employment and Society

Abstract

This paper is motivated by an unease that a labour process approach to managerial work, if it is to be based upon simplistic assumptions that management itself is a labour process will actually obscure many of the contradictions which exist within managerial capitalism and which a true labour process approach should be concerned to expose and analyse. To that end Braverman's treatment of management as a labour process is criticised and shown to be inconsistent with his own analysis of the fate of productive labour in monopoly capitalism. The paper then argues that the core feature of management within capitalist social relations of production is the agency relationship. This is shown to contain contradictions between the inevitable dependence of employers and senior managers on trust and the fact that this is expensive, which gives them incentives to dispense with it, so far as is possible, in favour of the deskilling and monitoring of management work. This inbuilt contradiction creates a micro-political and historical dynamism within capitalist management organisation which makes broad-brush sense of many of the developments which have occurred over the last century and which promises much for more detailed analysis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0950017089003003003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.2307/2490699 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90029-8 · DOI
  3. Armstrong, P.J., The Abandonment of Productive Intervention in British Management Teaching Syllabi: an historical analysis
  4. Bowie, J.A., Education for Business Management
  5. Braverman, H., Labor and Monopoly Capital, 10.14452/MR-026-03-1974-07_1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Burawoy, M., Manufacturing Consent, 10.7208/chicago/9780226217710.001.0001 · DOI
  7. Chandler, A.D., The Visible Hand: the managerial revolution in American Business, 10.2307/j.ctvjghwrj · DOI
  8. 10.1177/017084068901000106 · DOI
  9. Coad, R., Laing
  10. Cooley, M., Science, Technology and the Labour Process: Marxist studies: Vol 1, 46
  11. Dalton, M., Men Who Manage
  12. Edwards, R.C., Contested Terrain: the Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century
  13. 10.1177/030630708100600304 · DOI
  14. Fox. A., Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations
  15. Freidman, A.L., Industry and Labour: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism
  16. Gordon, D.M., Segmented Work, Divided Workers: the historical transformation of labor in the United States
  17. Hartman, H., Authority and Organisation in German Management
  18. 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X · DOI · Paper page
  19. Johnson, T., Industrial Society: Class, Cleavage and Control, 93
  20. Kanter, R.M., Men and Women of the Corporation
  21. Kerr, C., Industrialism and Industrial Man
  22. Koontz, H., Principles of Management: an analysis of managerial functions
  23. Levenson, B., Organisational Careers: a sourcebook for theory
  24. Lambert, R.S., The Railway King 1800-1871: a study of George Hudson and the business morals of his time
  25. Littler, C., The Development of the Labour Process in Capitalist Societies
  26. Lockwood, D., The Blackcoated Worker
  27. Mangham, I.L., Management Training: context and practice
  28. March, J.G., Organisations
  29. Marx, K., Capital
  30. Middlemass, R.K., The Master Builders
  31. Moore, W., The Conduct of the Corporation
  32. National Economic Development Council, The Making of Managers
  33. Pollard, S., The Genesis of Modern Management
  34. Sampson, A., The Anatomy of Britain Today
  35. Stacey, N.A.H., English Accountancy: a study in social and economic history. 1800-1954
  36. 10.1177/0143831X8564002 · DOI
  37. Urwick, L.F., Management Education in American Business
  38. 10.1086/467051 · DOI
  39. Watts, R.L., Positive Accounting Theory
  40. Wilkinson, B., `Cultural Manipulation as a Strategy of Organisational Control: Managing Managers at Sherwood's Foods'
  41. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00416.x · DOI
  42. Wilson, C., The History of Unilever: a study in Economic and Social Change, 10.1002/tie.5060110111 · DOI
  43. Wright, E.O., Classes

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Armstrong, P.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, Peter
Venue
Work, Employment and Society
Published
1989-09
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
307-322
ISSN
  • 0950-0170 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8722
OpenAlex
W2096922939
Cited by
122
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Work Employment and Society (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Labor Movements and Unions
Keywords
labour process theory, managerial work, principal-agent relationship, managerial capitalism, deskilling, monitoring, trust in management, productive labor, monopoly capitalism, Braverman, contradictions of capitalism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management, Labour Process and Agency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0950017089003003003
The paper
Armstrong, P. (1989). Management, Labour Process and Agency. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017089003003003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.