Cited by 116Health Policy Implementation ScienceOrganizational Change and LeadershipHealthcare Quality and Management

Innovation sustainability in challenging health-care contexts: Embedding clinically led change in routine practice

Open access
Martin, Graham P, Weaver, Simon, Currie, Graeme, Finn, Rachael, McDonald, Ruth·2012·Health Services Management Research

Abstract

Summary: The need for organizational innovation as a means of improving health-care quality and containing costs is widely recognized, but while a growing body of research has improved knowledge of implementation, very little has considered the challenges involved in sustaining change – especially organizational change led ‘bottom-up’ by frontline clinicians. This study addresses this lacuna, taking a longitudinal, qualitative case-study approach to understanding the paths to sustainability of four organizational innovations. It highlights the importance of the interaction between organizational context, nature of the innovation and strategies deployed in achieving sustainability. It discusses how positional influence of service leads, complexity of innovation, networks of support, embedding in existing systems, and proactive responses to changing circumstances can interact to sustain change. In the absence of cast-iron evidence of effectiveness, wider notions of value may be successfully invoked to sustain innovation. Sustainability requires continuing effort through time, rather than representing a final state to be achieved. Our study offers new insights into the process of sustainability of organizational change, and elucidates the complement of strategies needed to make bottom-up change last in challenging contexts replete with competing priorities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0951484812474246

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 116

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Secretary of State for Health High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. London: The Stationery Office, 2008

Authors
Martin, G. P., Weaver, S., Currie, G., Finn, R., & McDonald, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Lecturer in Media and Communications, Sociology and Communications, Brunei University, School of Social Sciences, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Health Services Management Research
Published
2012-11
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
190-199
ISSN
  • 0951-4848 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1044
OpenAlex
W2144295947
Cited by
116
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Management Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (09/1001/40)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
bottom-up change, organizational innovation, healthcare quality improvement, routine practice, social support networks, competing priorities
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Organizational Innovation, Quality of Health Care, Organizational Case Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review