Cited by 0Biblical Studies and InterpretationReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, ChristianityHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

The Heptadic Chronologies of Testament of Levi 16–17 and Their Sources

Berner, Christoph·2012·Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha

Abstract

Chapters 16–17 of Testament of Levi ( T. Levi) preserve two examples for the creative reinterpretation of ancient Jewish chronologies in early Christianity. In T. Levi 16, the seventy weeks chronology from Dan. 9 is read as an announcement of Jesus' crucifixion and the destruction of the Second Temple. T. Levi 17, on the other hand, preserves an older Jewish source on the decline of the priesthood. This source was originally composed as a response to the deposition of Onias III (173 BCE) and later expanded through the addition of vv. 9-11 responding to the investment of Jonathan as high priest (152 BCE). For the Christian author of T. Levi 17, the original chronological implications of his source were no longer relevant. He incorporated it for purely theological reasons, namely, as a demonstration for the complete failure of the Jewish priesthood and its subsequent replacement by the eschatological high priest Jesus Christ ( T. Levi 18).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0951820712458632

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Beckwith R., 1996, AGJU, 33
  2. Berner C., 2006, BZAW, 363
  3. Berner C., 2009, Hen, 31, 17
  4. Charles R.H., 1913, The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament, 2
  5. Dimant D., 2001, DJD, 30
  6. Dupont-Sommer A., 1951, Sem, 4, 33
  7. Hollander H.W., 1985, SVTP, 8
  8. Hultgård A., 1982, L'eschatologie des testaments des douze patriarchs, 2
  9. Koch K., 1983, ZAW, 95, 403
  10. Scott J.M., 2005, JSJSup, 91
  11. Ulrichsen J.H., 1991, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Historia Religionum, 10
  12. VanderKam J.C., 1995, ZAW, 107, 80

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Berner, C.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Berner, Christoph
Venue
Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha
Published
2012-08-10
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
40-52
ISSN
  • 0951-8207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-5286
OpenAlex
W2049422849
Cited by
0
References
7
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
Daniel 9, Jewish chronology, early Christianity, Second Temple, Jonathan Maccabeus, high priesthood, eschatology, Jesus as high priest, pseudepigrapha, textual sources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review