The Heptadic Chronologies of Testament of Levi 16–17 and Their Sources
Abstract
Chapters 16–17 of Testament of Levi ( T. Levi) preserve two examples for the creative reinterpretation of ancient Jewish chronologies in early Christianity. In T. Levi 16, the seventy weeks chronology from Dan. 9 is read as an announcement of Jesus' crucifixion and the destruction of the Second Temple. T. Levi 17, on the other hand, preserves an older Jewish source on the decline of the priesthood. This source was originally composed as a response to the deposition of Onias III (173 BCE) and later expanded through the addition of vv. 9-11 responding to the investment of Jonathan as high priest (152 BCE). For the Christian author of T. Levi 17, the original chronological implications of his source were no longer relevant. He incorporated it for purely theological reasons, namely, as a demonstration for the complete failure of the Jewish priesthood and its subsequent replacement by the eschatological high priest Jesus Christ ( T. Levi 18).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Daniel: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel
Collins, J. J. (1994) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 250 · see citing works
The Book of Daniel in the Light of New Findings
van der Woude, A. S. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Untersuchungen zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Testamente der zwölf Patriarchen
Becker, J. J. (1970) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004332591 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
The Dead Sea Scrolls in Their Historical Context
Lim, T. H., Hurtado, L. W., Auld, A. G., et al. (2001) · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Das chronologische Konzept des Jubiläenbuches
VanderKam, J. C. (1995) · Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft · doi:10.1515/zatw.1995.107.1.80 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Koch, K. (1983) · Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft · doi:10.1515/zatw.1983.95.3.403 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Die Qumran-Essener: Die Texte vom Toten Meer
Maier, J. (1996) · Ernst Reinhardt Verlag eBooks · doi:10.2378/9783497013951 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Beckwith R., 1996, AGJU, 33
- Berner C., 2006, BZAW, 363
- Berner C., 2009, Hen, 31, 17
- Charles R.H., 1913, The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament, 2
- Dimant D., 2001, DJD, 30
- Dupont-Sommer A., 1951, Sem, 4, 33
- Hollander H.W., 1985, SVTP, 8
- Hultgård A., 1982, L'eschatologie des testaments des douze patriarchs, 2
- Koch K., 1983, ZAW, 95, 403
- Scott J.M., 2005, JSJSup, 91
- Ulrichsen J.H., 1991, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Historia Religionum, 10
- VanderKam J.C., 1995, ZAW, 107, 80
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Berner, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Berner, Christoph
- ORCID
- Berner, Christoph
- Venue
- Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-08-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-52
- ISSN
- 0951-8207 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-5286
- OpenAlex
- W2049422849
- Semantic Scholar
- f5cad13231220efa68838983cd8bbd9c80f659e1
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- Daniel 9, Jewish chronology, early Christianity, Second Temple, Jonathan Maccabeus, high priesthood, eschatology, Jesus as high priest, pseudepigrapha, textual sources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review