Data science, artificial intelligence and the third wave of digital era governance
Open accessAbstract
This article examines the model of digital era governance (DEG) in the light of the latest-wave of data-driven technologies, such as data science methodologies and artificial intelligence (labelled here DSAI). It identifies four key top-level macro-themes through which digital changes in response to these developments may be investigated. First, the capability to store and analyse large quantities of digital data obviates the need for data ‘compression’ that characterises Weberian-model bureaucracies, and facilitates data de-compression in data-intensive information regimes, where the capabilities of public agencies and civil society are both enhanced. Second, the increasing capability of robotic devices have expanded the range of tasks that machines extending or substituting workers’ capabilities can perform, with implications for a reshaping of state organisation. Third, DSAI technologies allow new options for partitioning state functions in ways that can maximise organisational productivity, in an ‘intelligent centre, devolved delivery’ model within vertical policy sectors. Fourth, within each tier of government, DSAI technologies offer new possibilities for ‘administrative holism’ - the horizontal allocation of power and functions between organisations, through state integration, common capacity and needs-based joining-up of services. Together, these four themes comprise a third wave of DEG changes, suggesting important administrative choices to be made regarding information regimes, state organisation, functional allocation and outsourcing arrangements, as well as a long-term research agenda for public administration, requiring extensive and detailed analysis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance
Dunleavy, P. (2005) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057 · Cited by 2,638 · cited 2× · see citing works
“As for the DEG1 wave (bottom row in Table 1), in many aspects, and especially in a much cited ‘ classic ’ article ‘ New public management is dead – long live digital era governance ’ (Dunleavy et al., 2006a), DEG1 tended to appear just as an antonym, de fi ned principally by its contrast with NPM.”
Self-citationDigital government and public management research: finding the crossroads
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
The Fallacy of AI Functionality
Raji, I. D., Kumar, I. E., Horowitz, A., & Selbst, A. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533158 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Robo-debt illegality: The seven veils of failed guarantees of the rule of law?
Carney, T. (2019) · Alternative Law Journal · doi:10.1177/1037969x18815913 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Rethinking AI for good governance
Margetts, H. (2022) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/daed_a_01922 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationDigital Weberianism: Bureaucracy, Information, and the Techno-rationality of Neoliberal Capitalism
Muellerleile, C., & Robertson, S. L. (2018) · Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies · doi:10.2979/indjglolegstu.25.1.0187 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies
Annapureddy, R., Fornaroli, A., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2025) · Digital Government: Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3685680 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Resh(AI)ping Good Administration: Addressing the Mass Effects of Public Sector Digitalisation
Sanchez-Graells, A. (2024) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws13010009 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dunleavy, P., & Margetts, H.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Margetts, Helen
- Venue
- Public Policy and Administration
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-09-25
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-214
- ISSN
- 0952-0767 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-4192
- OpenAlex
- W4387025480
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 182.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Public Policy and Administration (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Keywords
- digital era governance, data science, artificial intelligence, robotic devices, state organization, outsourcing, information regime, public administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review