Cited by 173Railway Engineering and DynamicsInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringTransportation Systems and Safety

Track geometry degradation and maintenance modelling: A review

Soleimanmeigouni, Iman, Ahmadi, Alireza, Kumar, Uday·2018·Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit

Abstract

Increased demand for railway transportation is creating a need for higher train speeds and axle loads. These, in turn, increase the likelihood of track degradation and failures. Modelling the degradation behaviour of track geometry and development of applicable and effective maintenance strategies has become a challenging concern for railway infrastructure managers. During the last three decades, a number of track geometry degradation and maintenance modelling approaches have been developed to predict and improve the railway track geometry condition. In this paper, existing track geometry measures are identified and discussed. Available models for track geometry degradation are reviewed and classified. Tamping recovery models are also reviewed and discussed to identify the issues and challenges of different available methodologies and models. Existing track geometry maintenance models are reviewed and critical observations on each contribution are provided. The most important track maintenance scheduling models are identified and discussed. Finally, the paper provides directions for further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0954409716657849

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML can help improve operation of low-carbon modes, for example by reducing rail operations and maintenance costs and predicting track degradation.

    “ML can also help to improve the operation of low-carbon modes, for example, by reducing the operations and maintenance costs of rail [383] and predicting track degradation [746].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [746]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soleimanmeigouni, I., Ahmadi, A., & Kumar, U.
Affiliations
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Soleimanmeigouni, Iman
Venue
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Published
2016-07-14
Volume
232
Issue
1
Pages
73-102
ISSN
  • 0954-4097 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-3017
OpenAlex
W2468016995
Cited by
173
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Railway Engineering and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Transportation Systems and Safety
Keywords
track geometry degradation, railway track condition, track maintenance scheduling, axle load, train speed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review