Cited by 16HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsGlobal Maternal and Child HealthHealth Policy Implementation Science

Health facility factors and quality of services to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission in Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, and Mozambique

Open access
Rustagi, Alison S, Gimbel, Sarah, Nduati, Ruth, Cuembelo, Maria de Fatima, Wasserheit, Judith N, Farquhar, Carey, Gloyd, Stephen, Sherr, Kenneth +1 more·2017·International Journal of STD & AIDS

Abstract

This study aimed to identify facility-level characteristics associated with prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission service quality. This cross-sectional study sampled 60 health facilities in Mozambique, Côte d’Ivoire, and Kenya (20 per country). Performance score – the proportion of pregnant women tested for HIV in first antenatal care visit, multiplied by the proportion of HIV-positive pregnant women who received appropriate antiretroviral medications – was calculated for each facility using routine data from 2012 to 2013. Facility characteristics were ascertained during on-site visits, including workload. Associations between facility characteristics and performance were quantified using generalized linear models with robust standard errors, adjusting for country. Over six months, facilities saw 38,611 first antenatal care visits in total. On-site CD4 testing, Pima CD4 machine, air conditioning, and low or high (but not mid-level) patient volume were each associated with higher performance scores. Each additional first antenatal care visit per nurse per month was associated with a 4% (95% confidence interval: 1%–6%) decline in the odds that an HIV-positive pregnant woman would receive both HIV testing and antiretroviral medications. Physician workload was only modestly associated with performance. Investments in infrastructure and human resources – particularly nurses – may be critical to improve prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission service delivery and protect infants from HIV.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956462416668766

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]WHO WHO consolidated guidelines on the use of anti-retroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach 11 2013 Geneva WHO 24716260
  2. [22]Tweya H Gugsa S Hosseinipour M Understanding factors, outcomes and reasons for loss to follow-up among women in Option B+ PMTCT programme in Lilongwe, Malawi Trop Med Int Health 2014 19 1360 1366 25087778

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rustagi, A. S., Gimbel, S., Nduati, R., Cuembelo, M. D. F., Wasserheit, J. N., Farquhar, C., Gloyd, S., Sherr, K., & with input from the SAIA Study Team
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Nairobi (KE)
  • Community Health Department, School of Medicine, University of Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique
Venue
International Journal of STD & AIDS
Published
2016-09-02
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
788-799
ISSN
  • 0956-4624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1052
OpenAlex
W2512289332
Cited by
16
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of STD & AIDS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH113435)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI027757)
  • Fogarty International Center (K02TW009207)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD075057)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, service quality, antenatal HIV testing, antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy, CD4 testing, nursing workload, health facility infrastructure, healthcare workers, Côte d'Ivoire, Kenya, Mozambique
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Facilities, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Cote d'Ivoire, Kenya, Mass Screening, Mothers, Mozambique, Prenatal Care, AIDS Serodiagnosis, HIV Infections, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Anti-HIV Agents, Quality Indicators, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review