The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In the Infant’s Mind’s Ear: Evidence for Implicit Naming in 18-Month-Olds
Open accessAbstract
Do infants implicitly name visually fixated objects whose names are known, and does this information influence their preference for looking at other objects? We presented 18-month-old infants with a picture-based phonological priming task and examined their recognition of named targets in primed (e.g., dog-door) and unrelated (e.g., dog-boat) trials. Infants showed better recognition of the target object in primed than in unrelated trials across three measures. As the prime image was never explicitly named during the experiment, the only explanation for the systematic influence of the prime image on target recognition is that infants, like adults, can implicitly name visually fixated images and that these implicitly generated names can prime infants' subsequent responses in a paired visual-object spoken-word-recognition task.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The ability to hold phonological representations in mind, however, appears to come online much earlier, possibly as young as 18 months (e.g., Mani & Plunkett, 2010).”
From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Mani & Plunkett, 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1098/rstb.2009.0146 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.27.2.198 · DOI
- 10.1080/01690960143000074 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03193787 · DOI
- Fenson L., 1993, MacArthur communicative development inventories: User’s guide and technical manual
- 10.1017/S030500090001271X · DOI
- 10.2307/1130325 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0305000900004414 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/089892902760191162 · DOI
- Kiss G.R., 1973, The computer and literary studies, 153
- 10.3758/BF03196826 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03193289 · DOI
- Moss H., 1996, Birkbeck word association norms
- 10.1017/S0142716400008742 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmla.2001.2799 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00021-9 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology
Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000021 · Cited by 864
“The ability to hold phonological representations in mind, however, appears to come online much earlier, possibly as young as 18 months (e.g., Mani & Plunkett, 2010).”
BackgroundPrediction during language processing is a piece of cake—But only for skilled producers.
Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/a0029284 · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mani, N., & Plunkett, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mani, Nivedita
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-06-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 908-913
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2170573648
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 20.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-23-1322, RES-000-)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- phonological priming, infant language acquisition, spoken word recognition, visual fixation, object recognition
- MeSH terms
- Cues, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Phonetics, Photic Stimulation, Task Performance and Analysis, Verbal Behavior, Infant Behavior, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
