CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form.

Jescheniak, Jörg D., Levelt, Willem J. M.·1994·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal o f Memoryt and Language, 24, 89-106.
  2. Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax. Psychologi cal Review, 89, 1-47.
  3. Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (in press). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook o f psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  4. Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The "tip-of-the-tongue" phenom enon. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325-337.
  5. Butterworth, B. (1980a). Some constraints on models of language production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 423^459). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  6. Butterworth, B. (1980b). Evidences from pauses in speech. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 155-176). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  7. Butterworth, B. (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 1 OS- 135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. Clark, H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
  9. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
  10. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  11. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation model of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
  12. Dell, G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal o f Memory and Language, 27, 124-142.
  13. Dell, G. S., & O 'Seaghdha, P. G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. (1991). Psychological Review, 98, 604-614.
  14. Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611-629.
  15. del Viso, S., Igoa, J. M., & Garcia-Albea, J. E. (1991). On the autonomy of phonological encoding: Evidence from slips of the tongue in Spanish. Journal o f Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 161-185.
  16. Feustel, T. C., Shiffrin, R. M., & Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. Journal o f Experimental Psychology': General, 112, 309-346.
  17. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
  18. Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology' o f learning and motivation: Vol. 9 (pp. 133-177). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  19. Garrett, M. F. (1976). Syntactic processing in sentence production. In E. Walker & R. Wales (Eds.), New approaches to language mecha nisms (pp. 231-256). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  20. Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 177-220). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  21. Garrett, M. F. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology; in cognitive functions (pp. 19-76). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  22. Garrett, M. F. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Survey o f Linguistics: Vol. 3. Language: Psychological and biological aspects (pp. 69-96). Cam bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  23. Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 553-568.
  24. Hotopf, W. H. N. (1980). Semantic similarity as a factor in whole-word slips of the tongue. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance (pp. 97-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  25. Huttenlocher, J., & Kubicek, L. F. (1983). The source of relatedness effects on naming latency. Journal o f Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 486-496.
  26. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal o f Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 21-38.
  27. Jescheniak, J. D. (1993b). Word frequency effects in speech production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, Nijme gen, The Netherlands.
  28. Kelly, M. H. (1986). On the selection o f linguistic options. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  29. Kirsner, K., Smith, M. C., Lockhart, R. S., King, M. L., & Jain, M. (1984). The bilingual lexicon: Language-specific units in an inte grated network. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 519-539.
  30. Kroll, J. F., & Curley, J. (1988). Lexical memory in novice bilinguals: The role of concepts in retrieving second language words. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects o f memory: Vol. 2 (pp. 389-395). New York: Wiley.
  31. Kroll, J. F., & Potter, M. C. (1984). Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 39-66.
  32. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  33. Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). Timing in speech production: With special reference to word form encoding. Annals o f the New York Academ y o f Sciences, 682, 283-295.
  34. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991a). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142.
  35. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991b). Normal and deviant lexical processing: Reply to Dell and O 'Seaghdha (1991). Psychological Review, 98, 615-618.
  36. McRae, K., Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in naming. Journal o f Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
  37. Mitchell, D. B., & Brown, A. S. (1988). Persistent repetition in picture naming and its dissociation from recognition memory. Journal o f Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 213- 222.
  38. Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal o f Experimental Psychology, 17, 273-281.
  39. Potter, M. C., So, K.-F., von Eckardt, B., & Feldman, L. B. (1984). Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 23-38.
  40. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in production: Picture-word interfer ence studies. Journal o f Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
  41. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal o f Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
  42. Wheeldon. L. R., & Monsell, S. (1992). The locus of repetition priming of spoken word production. Quarterly Journal o f Experimental Psychol ogy, 44A, 723-761.
  43. Winer, (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  44. Wingfield, A. (1968). Effects of frequency on identification and naming of objects. American Journal o f Psychology, 81, 226-234.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1994-07
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
824-843
ISSN
  • 1939-1285
  • 0278-7393
DOI
10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824
Cited by
443
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review