Rituals Enhance Consumption
Open accessAbstract
Four experiments tested the novel hypothesis that ritualistic behavior potentiates and enhances ensuing consumption—an effect found for chocolates, lemonade, and even carrots. Experiment 1 showed that participants who engaged in ritualized behavior, compared with those who did not, evaluated chocolate as more flavorful, valuable, and deserving of behavioral savoring. Experiment 2 demonstrated that random gestures do not boost consumption as much as ritualistic gestures do. It further showed that a delay between a ritual and the opportunity to consume heightens enjoyment, which attests to the idea that ritual behavior stimulates goal-directed action (to consume). Experiment 3 found that performing a ritual oneself enhances consumption more than watching someone else perform the same ritual, suggesting that personal involvement is crucial for the benefits of rituals to emerge. Finally, Experiment 4 provided direct evidence of the underlying process: Rituals enhance the enjoyment of consumption because of the greater involvement in the experience that they prompt.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vohs, Wang, Gino, and Norton (2013) found that performing rituals, compared with performing other acts, enhanced the eating experience by heightening the performers' perceived involvement in consumption.
“For instance, one set of experiments found that performing rituals, compared with performing other acts, enhanced the eating experience by heightening the performers' perceived involvement in consumption (Vohs, Wang, Gino, & Norton, 2013).”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Vohs, Wang, Gino, & Norton, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 158
- Authors
- Vohs, K. D., Wang, Y., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Harvard Business School, Harvard University
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vohs, Kathleen D.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-07-17
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1714-1721
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2167029652
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- ritual behavior, consumption, food enjoyment, ritual gestures, goal-directed action, personal involvement, consumer behavior, chocolate, lemonade, carrot
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Beverages, Cacao, Candy, Ceremonial Behavior, Cues, Decision Making, Feeding Behavior, Female, Gestures, Goals, Humans, Male, Motivation, Students, Daucus carota, Young Adult, Pleasure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review