Cited by 158Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationBehavioral Health and Interventions

Rituals Enhance Consumption

Open access
Vohs, Kathleen D., Wang, Yajin, Gino, Francesca, Norton, Michael I.·2013·Psychological Science

Abstract

Four experiments tested the novel hypothesis that ritualistic behavior potentiates and enhances ensuing consumption—an effect found for chocolates, lemonade, and even carrots. Experiment 1 showed that participants who engaged in ritualized behavior, compared with those who did not, evaluated chocolate as more flavorful, valuable, and deserving of behavioral savoring. Experiment 2 demonstrated that random gestures do not boost consumption as much as ritualistic gestures do. It further showed that a delay between a ritual and the opportunity to consume heightens enjoyment, which attests to the idea that ritual behavior stimulates goal-directed action (to consume). Experiment 3 found that performing a ritual oneself enhances consumption more than watching someone else perform the same ritual, suggesting that personal involvement is crucial for the benefits of rituals to emerge. Finally, Experiment 4 provided direct evidence of the underlying process: Rituals enhance the enjoyment of consumption because of the greater involvement in the experience that they prompt.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797613478949

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vohs, Wang, Gino, and Norton (2013) found that performing rituals, compared with performing other acts, enhanced the eating experience by heightening the performers' perceived involvement in consumption.

    “For instance, one set of experiments found that performing rituals, compared with performing other acts, enhanced the eating experience by heightening the performers' perceived involvement in consumption (Vohs, Wang, Gino, & Norton, 2013).”

    From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Vohs, Wang, Gino, & Norton, 2013

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 158

Authors
Vohs, K. D., Wang, Y., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Harvard Business School, Harvard University
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Vohs, Kathleen D.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2013-07-17
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1714-1721
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2167029652
Cited by
158
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
ritual behavior, consumption, food enjoyment, ritual gestures, goal-directed action, personal involvement, consumer behavior, chocolate, lemonade, carrot
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Beverages, Cacao, Candy, Ceremonial Behavior, Cues, Decision Making, Feeding Behavior, Female, Gestures, Goals, Humans, Male, Motivation, Students, Daucus carota, Young Adult, Pleasure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review