Cited by 100Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

On the nature and nurture of intelligence and specific cognitive abilities: The more heritable, the more culture dependent

Kan, Kees-Jan, Wicherts, Jelte M., Dolan, Conor V., van der Maas, Han L. J.·2013·Psychological Science

Abstract

To further knowledge concerning the nature and nurture of intelligence, we scrutinized how heritability coefficients vary across specific cognitive abilities both theoretically and empirically. Data from 23 twin studies (combined N = 7,852) showed that (a) in adult samples, culture-loaded subtests tend to demonstrate greater heritability coefficients than do culture-reduced subtests; and (b) in samples of both adults and children, a subtest’s proportion of variance shared with general intelligence is a function of its cultural load. These findings require an explanation because they do not follow from mainstream theories of intelligence. The findings are consistent with our hypothesis that heritability coefficients differ across cognitive abilities as a result of differences in the contribution of genotype-environment covariance. The counterintuitive finding that the most heritable abilities are the most culture-dependent abilities sheds a new light on the long-standing nature-nurture debate of intelligence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797613493292

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kan, K.-J., Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Maas, H. L. J.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam
Corresponding author
Kan, Kees-Jan
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2013-10-08
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
2420-2428
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2122796632
Cited by
100
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
heritability of intelligence, specific cognitive abilities, twin studies, general intelligence, nature versus nurture, intelligence theory
MeSH terms
Cognition, Culture, Humans, Intelligence, Twins, Wechsler Scales, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review