Self-Affirmation Among the Poor: Cognitive and Behavioral Implications
Abstract
The poor are universally stigmatized. The stigma of poverty includes being perceived as incompetent and feeling shunned and disrespected. It can lead to cognitive distancing, diminish cognitive performance, and cause the poor to forego beneficial programs. In the present research, we examined how self-affirmation can mitigate the stigma of poverty through randomized field experiments involving low-income individuals at an inner-city soup kitchen. Because of low literacy levels, we used an oral rather than written affirmation procedure, in which participants verbally described a personal experience that made them feel successful or proud. Compared with nonaffirmed participants, affirmed individuals exhibited better executive control, higher fluid intelligence, and a greater willingness to avail themselves of benefits programs. The effects were not driven by elevated positive mood, and the same intervention did not affect the performance of wealthy participants. The findings suggest that self-affirmation can improve the cognitive performance and decisions of the poor, and it may have important policy implications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Additional support for groups such as FSM students may signal that their group has historically underperformed and thus induce threat.
“it may signal to them that their group has historically underperformed and thus induce threat (Hall, Zhao, & Shafir, 2014;House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee, 2004;Kissane, 2003;Lens, Nugent, & Wimer, 2018;Leslie & Mayer, 2014;Sahota, Woodward, Molinari, & Pike, 2014).”
From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Hall, Zhao, & Shafir, 2014
Cites
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697 · see citing works
Poverty impedes cognitive function.
Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1238041 · Cited by 2,967 · see citing works
Self-citationRecursive Processes in Self-Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement Gap
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170769 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Sherman, D. K., Hartson, K. A., Binning, K. R., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Garcia, J., Taborsky-Barba, S., Tomassetti, S., Nussbaum, A. D., & Cohen, G. L. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031495 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
What's need got to do with it? Barriers to use of nonprofit social services
Kissane, R. J. (2003) · The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare · doi:10.15453/0191-5096.2898 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems.
Walton, G. M., & Wilson, T. D. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000115 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
A Self‐Regulatory Model of Resource Scarcity
Cannon, C., Goldsmith, K., & Roux, C. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1035 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions
Easterbrook, M. J., & Hadden, I. R. (2021) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12070 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Morris, S., Carlos, C., Kistruck, G. M., Lount, R. B., & Thomas, T. E. (2023) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1472 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hall, C. C., Zhao, J., & Shafir, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Princeton University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-12-19
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 619-625
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2110929177
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- self-affirmation, poverty stigma, low-income adults, executive function, fluid intelligence, cognitive performance, positive mood, social stigma
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty, Psychotherapy, Random Allocation, Self Concept, Executive Function, Social Stigma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review