Cited by 277Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentTryptophan and brain disorders

The Scent of Disease: Human Body Odor Contains an Early Chemosensory Cue of Sickness

Open access
Olsson, Mats J., Lundström, Johan N., Kimball, Bruce A., Gordon, Amy R., Karshikoff, Bianka, Hosseini, Nishteman, Sorjonen, Kimmo, Olgart Höglund, Caroline +4 more·2014·Psychological Science

Abstract

Observational studies have suggested that with time, some diseases result in a characteristic odor emanating from different sources on the body of a sick individual. Evolutionarily, however, it would be more advantageous if the innate immune response were detectable by healthy individuals as a first line of defense against infection by various pathogens, to optimize avoidance of contagion. We activated the innate immune system in healthy individuals by injecting them with endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide). Within just a few hours, endotoxin-exposed individuals had a more aversive body odor relative to when they were exposed to a placebo. Moreover, this effect was statistically mediated by the individuals’ level of immune activation. This chemosensory detection of the early innate immune response in humans represents the first experimental evidence that disease smells and supports the notion of a “behavioral immune response” that protects healthy individuals from sick ones by altering patterns of interpersonal contact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797613515681

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olsson, M. J., Lundström, J. N., Kimball, B. A., Gordon, A. R., Karshikoff, B., Hosseini, N., Sorjonen, K., Olgart Höglund, C., Solares, C., Soop, A., Axelsson, J., & Lekander, M.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Monell Chemical Senses Center (US)
  • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (US)
  • Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2014-01-22
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
817-823
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2096227780
Cited by
277
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Association for Psychological Science
  • Osher Center for Integrative Medicine
  • Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
  • Hjärt-Lungfonden
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2012.0141, KAW 2012.0141)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (KAW 2012.0141)
  • Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (P12–1017)
  • Stockholm Stress Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
body odor, innate immune response, endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide, immune activation, chemosensory detection, disease avoidance, interpersonal contact
MeSH terms
Adult, Cues, Female, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Odorants, Social Behavior, Olfactory Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review