The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs
Open accessAbstract
Researchers have long debated whether attentional capture is purely stimulus driven or purely goal driven. In the current study, we tested a hybrid account, called the signal-suppression hypothesis, which posits that stimuli automatically produce a bottom-up salience signal, but that this signal can be suppressed via top-down control processes. To test this account, we used a new capture-probe paradigm in which participants searched for a target shape while ignoring an irrelevant color singleton. On occasional probe trials, letters were briefly presented inside the search shapes, and participants attempted to report these letters. Under conditions that promoted capture by the irrelevant singleton, accuracy was greater for the letter inside the singleton distractor than for letters inside nonsingleton distractors. However, when the conditions were changed to avoid capture by the singleton, accuracy for the letter inside the irrelevant singleton was reduced below the level observed for letters inside nonsingleton distractors, an indication of active suppression of processing at the singleton location.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the recently proposed “signal suppression hypothesis” (Sawaki & Luck, 2010) states that features of an irrelevant distractor that generates a strong bottom-up signal can be actively suppressed in a top-down way such that the distractor no longer captures attention (see also Gaspelin, Leonard, & Luck, 2015).”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Gaspelin, Leonard, & Luck, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brainard, D. H. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00357 · Cited by 20,012
Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030 · Cited by 2,487
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210951 · Cited by 2,433
Perceptual selectivity for color and form
Theeuwes, J. (1992) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211656 · Cited by 1,649
Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection
Theeuwes, J. (2010) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006 · Cited by 1,385
Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture
Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03205306 · Cited by 1,178
Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention
Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03208805 · Cited by 971
Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.847 · Cited by 744
Wolfe, J. M. (2007) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189193.003.0008 · Cited by 739
Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4
Bichot, N. P., Rossi, A. F., & Desimone, R. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1109676 · Cited by 672
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.847 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli
Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001 · Cited by 468
Self-citationProgress toward resolving the attentional capture debate
Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2020) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949 · Cited by 413
Self-citationSelection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.
Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y · Cited by 345
Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons
Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2016) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1209-1 · Cited by 260
Self-citationHow to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression
Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-018-1493-z · Cited by 241
Combined Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence for the Suppression of Salient Distractors
Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01279 · Cited by 218
Self-citationLaws of concatenated perception: Vision goes for novelty, decisions for perseverance
Pascucci, D., Mancuso, G., Santandrea, E., Libera, C. D., Plomp, G., & Chelazzi, L. (2019) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000144 · Cited by 217
The past, present, and future of selection history
Anderson, B. A., Kim, H., Kim, A. J., Liao, M., Mrkonja, L., Clement, A., & Grégoire, L. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.004 · Cited by 218
Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression.
Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000484 · Cited by 193
Self-citationWhat to expect where and when: how statistical learning drives visual selection
Theeuwes, J., Bogaerts, L., & van Moorselaar, D. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.001 · Cited by 192
Getting rid of visual distractors: the why, when, how, and where
Chelazzi, L., Marini, F., Pascucci, D., & Turatto, M. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.02.004 · Cited by 200
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy
Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-018-1562-3 · Cited by 152
van Moorselaar, D., & Slagter, H. A. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0593-19.2019 · Cited by 149
Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering
Feldmann‐Wüstefeld, T., & Vogel, E. K. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx336 · Cited by 129
Prefrontal Control of Visual Distraction
Cosman, J. D., Lowe, K. A., Zinke, W., Woodman, G. F., & Schall, J. D. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.023 · Cited by 123
Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate
Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.013 · Cited by 117
Self-citationFeature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
Stilwell, B. T., Bahle, B., & Vecera, S. P. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000613 · Cited by 113
Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention
Chang, S., & Egeth, H. E. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619878813 · Cited by 112
Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
Won, B.-Y., Kosoyan, M., & Geng, J. J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000594 · Cited by 115
Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E. D., & Lien, M.-C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000214 · Cited by 93
Self-citationSauter, M., Liesefeld, H. R., Zehetleitner, M., & Müller, H. J. (2018) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-017-1477-4 · Cited by 97
Ten simple rules to study distractor suppression
Wöstmann, M., Störmer, V. S., Obleser, J., Addleman, D. A., Andersen, . K., Gaspelin, N., Geng, J. J., Luck, S. J., Noonan, M. P., Slagter, H. A., et al. (2022) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102269 · Cited by 97
Self-citationA temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control
Weaver, M. D., van Zoest, W., & Hickey, C. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.004 · Cited by 87
Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction
Liesefeld, H. R., Lamy, D., Gaspelin, N., Geng, J. J., Kerzel, D., Schall, J. D., Allen, H. A., Anderson, B. A., Boettcher, S., Busch, N. A., et al. (2024) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-023-02820-3 · Cited by 88
Self-citationDistractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.
Geng, J. J., DiQuattro, N. E., & Helm, J. L. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000430 · Cited by 90
Oculomotor inhibition of salient distractors: Voluntary inhibition cannot override selection history
Gaspelin, N., Gaspar, J. M., & Luck, S. J. (2019) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2019.1600090 · Cited by 83
Self-citationRejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience
Vatterott, D. B., Mozer, M. C., & Vecera, S. P. (2017) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-017-1465-8 · Cited by 81
A theoretical attempt to revive the serial/parallel-search dichotomy
Liesefeld, H. R., & Müller, H. J. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01819-z · Cited by 80
The Distractor Positivity Component and the Inhibition of Distracting Stimuli
Gaspelin, N., Lamy, D., Egeth, H. E., Liesefeld, H. R., Kerzel, D., Mandal, A., Müller, M. M., Schall, J. D., Schubö, A., Slagter, H. A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02051 · Cited by 75
Self-citationBeck, V. M., Luck, S. J., & Hollingworth, A. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000485 · Cited by 70
Self-citationThe architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
Bahle, B., Beck, V. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000509 · Cited by 70
Statistical regularities bias overt attention
Wang, B., Samara, I., & Theeuwes, J. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01708-5 · Cited by 73
Attentional Capture and Control
Theeuwes, J. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-011624-025340 · Cited by 74
Proactive enhancement and suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
Huang, C., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0001002 · Cited by 66
Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search
Huang, C., Vilotijević, A., Theeuwes, J., & Donk, M. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01891-3 · Cited by 64
Electrophysiological Evidence for the Suppression of Highly Salient Distractors
Stilwell, B. T., Egeth, H. E., & Gaspelin, N. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01827 · Cited by 64
Self-citationContrasting reactive and proactive control of emotional distraction.
Grimshaw, G. M., Kranz, L. S., Carmel, D., Moody, R., & Devue, C. (2017) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000337 · Cited by 66
Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.
Britton, M. K., & Anderson, B. A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000718 · Cited by 60
Kerzel, D., & Burra, N. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01535 · Cited by 59
Turatto, M., Bonetti, F., Pascucci, D., & Chelazzi, L. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000503 · Cited by 58
The Attentional Capture Debate: When Can We Avoid Salient Distractors and When Not?
Theeuwes, J. (2023) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.251 · Cited by 64
“Top-down” Does Not Mean “Voluntary”
Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.28 · Cited by 57
Self-citationSauter, M., Liesefeld, H. R., & Müller, H. J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000691 · Cited by 57
Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search
Feldmann‐Wüstefeld, T., Weinberger, M., & Awh, E. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2418-20.2021 · Cited by 54
An adaptive view of attentional control.
Anderson, B. A. (2021) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000917 · Cited by 57
Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01672-z · Cited by 53
Drisdelle, B. L., & Eimer, M. (2021) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13878 · Cited by 51
History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors
Adam, K. C. S., & Serences, J. T. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3099-20.2021 · Cited by 49
Arousal-Biased Competition Explains Reduced Distraction by Reward Cues under Threat
Kim, A. J., & Anderson, B. A. (2020) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0099-20.2020 · Cited by 48
Theeuwes, J., & Failing, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108891288 · Cited by 50
Proactively location-based suppression elicited by statistical learning
Kong, S., Li, X., Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233544 · Cited by 46
Oxner, M., Martinović, J., Forschack, N., Lempe, R., Gundlach, C., & Müller, M. M. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001350 · Cited by 46
Can salient stimuli really be suppressed?
Chang, S., & Egeth, H. E. (2020) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02207-8 · Cited by 46
Attentional economics links value-modulated attentional capture and decision-making
Pearson, D., Watson, P., Albertella, L., & Pelley, M. E. L. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00053-z · Cited by 51
Failed Suppression of Salient Stimuli Precedes Behavioral Errors
Feldmann‐Wüstefeld, T., Busch, N. A., & Schubö, A. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01502 · Cited by 45
On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?
Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E. D., & Hauck, C. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01599-y · Cited by 44
Probing early attention following negative and positive templates
Zhang, Z., Gapelin, N., & Carlisle, N. B. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01864-8 · Cited by 41
Dynamics of attentional allocation to targets and distractors during visual search
Forschack, N., Gundlach, C., Hillyard, S. A., & Müller, M. M. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119759 · Cited by 40
Lega, C., Ferrante, O., Marini, F., Santandrea, E., Cattaneo, L., & Chelazzi, L. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2740-18.2019 · Cited by 39
Reward association facilitates distractor suppression in human visual search
Gong, M., Yang, F., & Li, S. (2016) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13174 · Cited by 40
Wolf, C., & Lappe, M. (2021) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-020-09661-y · Cited by 38
Distractor-interference reduction is dimensionally constrained
Liesefeld, H. R., Liesefeld, A. M., & Müller, H. J. (2019) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2018.1561568 · Cited by 40
Heuer, A., & Schubö, A. (2019) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01211-4 · Cited by 37
Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory
Hakim, N., Feldmann‐Wüstefeld, T., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab013 · Cited by 41
Inversion of pop-out for a distracting feature dimension in monkey visual cortex
Klink, P. C., Teeuwen, R. R. M., Lorteije, J. A. M., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2210839120 · Cited by 36
Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
Won, B.-Y., & Geng, J. J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000521 · Cited by 35
Learning to ignore salient distractors: Attentional set and habituation
Tommaso, M. D., & Turatto, M. (2019) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2019.1583298 · Cited by 35
Prefrontal Control of Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms of Visual Suppression
Bello, F. D., Hassen, S. B. H., Ästrand, E., & Hamed, S. B. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab378 · Cited by 35
Attentional dwelling and capture by color singletons
Ruthruff, E. D., Faulks, M., Maxwell, J. W., & Gaspelin, N. (2020) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02054-7 · Cited by 34
Self-citationEye Tracking in Visual Search Experiments
Hollingworth, A., & Bahle, B. (2019) · Neuromethods · doi:10.1007/7657_2019_30 · Cited by 33
Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression.
Pearson, D., Watson, P., Cheng, P., & Pelley, M. E. L. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000728 · Cited by 34
Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search
Stilwell, B. T., & Vecera, S. P. (2018) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-018-1622-8 · Cited by 33
The role of salience in the suppression of distracting stimuli
Stilwell, B. T., Adams, O. J., Egeth, H. E., & Gaspelin, N. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02302-5 · Cited by 32
Self-citationFu, D., Weber, C., Yang, G., Kerzel, M., Nan, W., Barros, P. V. A., Wu, H., Liu, X., & Wermter, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2020.00010 · Cited by 36
Negative and positive templates: Two forms of cued attentional control
Carlisle, N. B. (2022) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-022-02590-4 · Cited by 32
Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations
Ruthruff, E. D., & Gaspelin, N. (2017) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-017-1440-4 · Cited by 32
Self-citationOculomotor suppression of abrupt onsets versus color singletons
Adams, O. J., Ruthruff, E. D., & Gaspelin, N. (2022) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-022-02524-0 · Cited by 31
Self-citationWyble, B., Flintoft, C. C., Chen, H., Marinov, T. M., Sarkar, A., & Bowman, H. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000245 · Cited by 33
Integrating salience and action – Increased integration strength through salience
Schmalbrock, P., Laub, R., & Frings, C. (2021) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2020.1871455 · Cited by 32
Victeur, Q., Huguet, P., & Silvert, L. (2019) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2019.1622512 · Cited by 31
Pelley, M. E. L., Ung, R., Mine, C., Most, S. B., Watson, P., Pearson, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2022) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7 · Cited by 32
van Moorselaar, D., Huang, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01986 · Cited by 28
Signal suppression 2.0: An updated account of attentional capture and suppression
Gaspelin, N., Ma, X., & Luck, S. J. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02736-z · Cited by 30
Self-citationSuppression history of distractor location biases attentional and oculomotor control
Caro, V. D., Theeuwes, J., & Libera, C. D. (2019) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2019.1617376 · Cited by 30
The influence of hatha yoga on stress, anxiety, and suppression: A randomized controlled trial
Szaszkó, B., Schmid, R. R., Pomper, U., Maiworm, M., Laiber, S., Tschenett, H., Nater, U. M., & Ulrich Ansorge, A. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104075 · Cited by 32
Kim, H., Nanavaty, N., Ahmed, H., Mathur, V. A., & Anderson, B. A. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01769 · Cited by 30
Forschack, N., Gundlach, C., Hillyard, S. A., & Müller, M. M. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab450 · Cited by 28
Hamblin-Frohman, Z., Chang, S., Egeth, H. E., & Becker, S. I. (2022) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-022-02536-w · Cited by 28
Gong, M., Jia, K., & Li, S. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0217-17.2017 · Cited by 29
Attentional capture alters feature perception.
Chen, J., Leber, A. B., & Golomb, J. D. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000681 · Cited by 27
Flexibility in Attentional Control: Multiple Sources and Suppression.
Carlisle, N. B. (2019) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 27
Attentional capture: An ameliorable side-effect of searching for salient targets
Liesefeld, H. R., Liesefeld, A. M., & Müller, H. J. (2021) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2021.1925798 · Cited by 27
Trichotomy revisited: A monolithic theory of attentional control
Anderson, B. A. (2024) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2024.108366 · Cited by 27
Statistical learning affects the time courses of salience-driven and goal-driven selection.
Huang, C., Theeuwes, J., & Donk, M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000781 · Cited by 27
Neural evidence for attentional capture by salient distractors
Lin, R., Meng, X., Chen, F., Li, X., Jensen, O. B., Theeuwes, J., & Wang, B. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01852-5 · Cited by 28
When attended and conscious perception deactivates fronto-parietal regions
Farooqui, A. A., & Manly, T. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.004 · Cited by 26
Deviant sounds yield distraction irrespective of the sounds’ informational value.
Parmentier, F. B. R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000195 · Cited by 29
Rashal, E., Senoussi, M., Santandrea, E., Hamed, S. B., Macaluso, E., Chelazzi, L., & Boehler, C. N. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14002 · Cited by 24
Systemic effects of selection history on learned ignoring
Kim, A. J., & Anderson, B. A. (2022) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02050-4 · Cited by 24
Memory guidance in distractor suppression is governed by the availability of cognitive control
Wen, W., Hou, Y., & Li, S. (2018) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-018-1511-1 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Center for Mind and Brain
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gaspelin, Nicholas
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-09-29
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1740-1750
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- PMC
- PMC4922750
- OpenAlex
- W2176026914
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 15.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH076226)
- National Eye Institute (T32EY013587, F32EY024834, P30EY012576, T32EY015387)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- attentional capture, top-down control, bottom-up salience, distractor suppression, color singleton, visual search, top-down attention, bottom-up attention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Cues, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
