Cited by 1,649Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Perceptual selectivity for color and form

Open access
Theeuwes, Jan·1992·Perception & Psychophysics

Abstract

Three visual-search experiments tested whether the preattentive parallel stage can selectively guide the attentive stage to a particular known-to-be-relevant target feature. Subjects searched multielement displays for a salient green circle that had a unique form when surrounded by green nontarget squares or had a unique color when surrounded by red nontarget circles. In the distractor conditions, a salient item in the other dimension was present as well. As an extension of earlier findings (Theeuwes, 1991), the results showed that complete top-down selectivity toward a particular feature was not possible, not even after extended and consistent practice. The results reveal that selectivity depends on the relative discriminability of the stimulus dimensions: the presence of an irrelevant item with a unique color interferes with parallel search for a unique form, and vice versa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03211656

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physically salient task-irrelevant distractors can disrupt top-down control and capture attention and eyes.

    “For example, research demonstrated that when searching for a given target, physically salient distractors that are otherwise irrelevant for the task at hand can disrupt top-down control and capture attention (“attentional capture”: Theeuwes, 1992; Yantis & Jonides, 1990) as well as our eyes (“oculomotor capture”: Theeuwes, Kramer, Hahn & Irwin, 1998; Theeuwes, Kramer, Hahn, Irwin, & Zelinsky, 1999”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Theeuwes, 1992

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. BROADBENT, D. E. (1970). Stimulus and response set: Two kinds ofselcc- live attention. In D. Mostofsky (Ed.), Altenrion: ConIemporary theories and analysis (pp. 51-(j(). New York: Appleton-eentury-erofts.
  2. DUNCAN, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. Posner & O. Marin (Eds.), Attention andperformance XJ(pp. 85-106). Hills- dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  3. TREISMAN, A. M. (1988). Feature and objects: The 14th Banlett me- morial lecture. Quanerly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 201-237.
  4. TREISMAN, A. M., &; GoRMICAN, S. (1988). Feature search in early vi- sion; Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Theeuwes, J.
Affiliations
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Theeuwes, Jan
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Published
1992-11
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
599-606
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
OpenAlex
W1991630384
Cited by
1,649
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 67
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
visual search, top-down attention, feature selectivity, color, form, distractor interference, discriminability, attention guidance, practice effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Color Perception, Equipment Design, Female, Form Perception, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Perceptual Masking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review