The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transaction Frame Determines Preferences: Valuation of Labor by Employee and Contractor
Open accessAbstract
A major concern in today’s economic reality is the extent to which a sharing economy, in comparison with a traditional economy, promotes inequality. In the transformation from a traditional to a sharing economy, wage setting is replaced by contract pricing. The switch to contract trading implies that the party who carries out the labor evaluates the transaction from a buyer’s rather than a seller’s perspective. Drawing on psychological research on constructed and reference-dependent preferences, we predicted that the net valuation of work would decrease when the regimen involved contract trading. Three experiments ( N = 1,105) eliciting work valuation under the two regimens confirmed our prediction, thus pointing to a novel factor that increases inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Precarious working conditions for gig workers stem in part from ambiguous information about the type of contract offered and role that service providers play.
“As the review highlights, precarious working conditions for gig workers stem in part from ambiguous information about the type of contract offered and role that service providers play (Ritov & Schurr, 2020).”
From The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework (2021) · cites this paper as Ritov & Schurr, 2020
The Discussion (page not available) reports that labor is valued less when framed as a job contract rather than an employment wage, and links that difference partly to the parties’ roles in the transaction. It does not say that ambiguous information about contracts or service providers’ roles causes precarious working conditions for gig workers. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617708630 · Cited by 986
Small Telescopes: Detectability and the Evaluation of Replication Results
Simonsohn, U. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614567341 · Cited by 742
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Ashby N. J., 2012, Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 254, 10.1017/S1930297500002230 · DOI
- 10.1002/bs.3830090304 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.45.8.1057 · DOI
- 10.1177/0956797609355572 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.461 · DOI
- 10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bdm.698 · DOI
- 10.2307/1911072 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511618031 · DOI
- Morewedge C. K., Giblin C. E. (2015). Explanations of the endowment effect: An integrative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 19, 339–348. · DOI
- 10.4159/9780674369542 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1783 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.364 · DOI
- Smith A. (2007). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations: Books I, II, III, IV, and V. Retrieved from http://www.ibiblio.org/ml/libri/s/SmithA_WealthNations_p.pdf. (Original work published 1776) · DOI
- 10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmr.09.0103 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511618031.022 · DOI
- 10.4159/9780674726123 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/bul0000095 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework
C. Köbis, N., Soraperra, I., & Shalvi, S. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320967740 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritov, I., & Schurr, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Ritov, Ilana
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-04-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 634-643
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- PMC
- PMC7289047
- OpenAlex
- W3022743871
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Israel Science Foundation (1068/15 and 1323/16)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Keywords
- sharing economy, contract pricing, wage determination, work valuation, reference-dependent preferences, labor market inequality, employee-employer relations
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Decision Making, Decision Theory, Employment, Female, Financial Management, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Salaries and Fringe Benefits, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
