The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
`A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid': The Social Construction of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom
Abstract
A succession of well-publicized incidents in Britain, and elsewhere, has highlighted the dilemma of refugees and seekers of asylum. A number of desperate human tragedies allied to some very dubious institutional practices and decisions have been a cause for concern. Drawing upon that vast corpus of information we call `common knowledge', together with other more exclusive sources of knowledge, British national newspapers and their readers, among others, are involved in the social construction of asylum-seekers. Ideas of citizenship, identity and Nation-hood are employed within a variety of discursive and rhetorical strategies that form part of an `elite' discourse, one that contributes to a `new Apartheid'. This article presents a discursive and rhetorical analysis of letters written to British national newspapers by members of the public. Asylum-seekers find themselves [re]positioned and contrasted with a variety of other social groups in such a way as to justify disregarding some of the central tenets of British democracy. Dissenting voices and a `counter' discourse are evident although very much a minority. It is argued that applied discursive work is necessary to bolster resistance and deconstruct the `new Apartheid'.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
(1969) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.45.527.642 · Cited by 14,231
Bhabha, H. K. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203820551 · Cited by 14,203
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074659 · Cited by 11,611
Mills, C. W. (1959) · The Mississippi Valley Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1891592 · Cited by 8,191
Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays
Althusser, L., & Brewster, B. R. (1971) · Cited by 7,969
(2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim270040011 · Cited by 5,395
(1987) · Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) · Cited by 4,513
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L., Wilkinson, J., & Weaver, P. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,349
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2001) · How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings · doi:10.5040/9781350933927.ch-002 · Cited by 3,307
Cited by
Esses, V. M., Medianu, S., & Lawson, A. S. (2013) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12027 · Cited by 637
Shifting the refugee narrative? An automated frame analysis of Europe’s 2015 refugee crisis
Greussing, E., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2017.1282813 · Cited by 464
De Coninck, D. (2020) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2019.1694406 · Cited by 175
The Generalizability of Discursive Research
Goodman, S. (2008) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780880802465890 · Cited by 67
Suspect technologies: forensic testing of asylum seekers at the UK border
Tutton, R., Hauskeller, C., & Sturdy, S. (2014) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.870667 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynn, N., & Lea, S.
- Venue
- Discourse & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 425-452
- ISSN
- 0957-9265 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3624
- OpenAlex
- W2163098752
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 20.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: `A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid': The Social Construction of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0957926503014004002
- The paper
- Lynn, N., & Lea, S. (2003). `A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid': The Social Construction of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014004002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.