The Manufacture of `Public Opinion' by Reporters: Informal Cues for Public Perceptions of Protest Groups
Abstract
This study examines how conceptions of `public opinion' are embedded within news-coverage of social protests at two levels: the micro-level in terms of informal characterizations of public opinion and the macro-level in terms of general conceptions of public opinion. At the micro-level, public opinion is brought into news stories in a variety of ways, including: statements about public opinion, depictions of compliance with or violation of social norms and laws, and portrayals of bystanders as symbols for public reaction. At the macro-level, coverage may have an underlying conception of public opinion as (1) aggregated individual opinion, (2) attempts of various groups to affect public policy and (3) a mechanism of social control. This case study of mainstream and alternative media coverage of three anarchist protests reveals differences at both the micro-descriptive and macro-conceptual levels.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Thematic instead of episodic coverage helps advance the larger goals of the BLM movement and counter the protest paradigm by focusing on racism instead of foregrounding protests as events.
“This thematic instead of episodic coverage then helps to advance the larger goals of the BLM movement and counter the protest paradigm, by focusing on racism, which is the reason behind the protests, instead of foregrounding the protests as events (McLeod and Hertog 1992;Smith et al. 2001).”
From Reporting on Black Lives Matter in 2020: How Digital Black Press Outlets Covered the Racial Uprisings (2025) · cites this paper as McLeod and Hertog 1992
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 258
- Authors
- McLeod, D. M., & Hertog, J. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- ORCID
- McLeod, Douglas M.
- Venue
- Discourse & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-275
- ISSN
- 0957-9265 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3624
- OpenAlex
- W2004346146
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Discourse & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Discourse and Social Analysis
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Keywords
- public opinion, news coverage of protests, social protest, media framing, social control, alternative media, mainstream media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review