Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Archival insights into vulnerability and risk management during the early Spanish colonial period (1598–1680 AD) in New Mexico

Dawson, Emily, Trigg, Heather·2022·The Holocene

Abstract

Risk and vulnerability are especially acute for colonizing populations due to their limited knowledge of the environment in newly settled areas and constrained social networks. Focusing on the initial settlement of the New Mexico colony, this paper examines the social response of Spanish colonists to vulnerability and risk during the early colonial period (AD 1598–1680). We use historical documents and modern weather records to assess the strategies implemented by 17th-century colonists to mitigate their vulnerability to the effects of unfamiliar, arid environmental conditions. The Spanish Crown had developed risk-reducing practices that encouraged successful establishment of colonies, including technological methods such as irrigation ditches and social methods such as tithing. However, these strategies made certain social and ethnic groups more vulnerable than others, ultimately contributing to the destruction of the New Mexico colony during the Pueblo Revolt in 1680. We argue that vulnerability buffering mechanisms are unevenly distributed across society. Systems of power must be considered when evaluating the effectiveness of social responses to risk.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/09596836221122632

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1007/BF02286420 · DOI
  2. Anschuetz KF, 2007, Kiva: The Journal of Southwestern Anthropology and History, 73, 173, 10.1179/kiv.2007.73.2.005 · DOI
  3. Anschuetz KF, 2012, Native Peoples of the Southwest: Negotiating Land, Water, and Ethnicities, 49
  4. Ayer EE, 1916, The Memorial of Fray Alonso de Benavides, 1630
  5. Baxter JO, 1993, El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro Vol. 1. New Mexico Bureau of Land Management Cultural Resources Series No. 11, 113
  6. 10.1007/s10816-010-9082-z · DOI
  7. 10.1179/kiv.2009.75.1.005 · DOI
  8. Choriki RT, 1964, Crops and Soil, 16, 24
  9. 10.1179/kiv.2007.72.4.001 · DOI
  10. Deagan K, 1983, Spanish St. Augustine: The Archaeology of a Colonial Creole Community
  11. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/9780470712795 · DOI
  13. 10.2737/RM-GTR-268 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/grl.50184 · DOI
  15. Hackett CW, 1937, Historical Documents Relating to New Mexico. Nueva Vizcaya, and Approaches Thereto, to 1773, 3
  16. Hackett CW, 1942, Revolt of the Pueblo Indians of New Mexico and Otermin’s Attempted Reconquest, 1680–1682, Part 1
  17. Hammond GP, 1940, Narratives of the Coronado Expedition, 1540-1542
  18. Hammond GP, 1953, Don Juan de Oñate: Colonizer of New Mexico 1598-1628
  19. Hegmon M, 1989, Research in Economic Anthropology, 11, 89
  20. Hodge FW, 1945, Fray Alonso de Benavides' Revised Memorial of 1634: With Numerous Supplementary Documents Elaborately Annotated
  21. Ivey JE, 1994, Journal of the Southwest, 36, 76
  22. Kessell JL, 2003, Spain in the Southwest: A Narrative History of Colonial New Mexico, Arizona, Texas, and California
  23. Kohler TA, 2010, Leaving Mesa Verde: Peril and Change in the Thirteenth-Century Southwest
  24. 10.1017/aaq.2017.39 · DOI
  25. Lightfoot DR, 1990, The prehistoric pebble-mulched fields of the Galisteo Anasazi: Agricultural innovation and adaptation to environment
  26. 10.1002/gea.3340080502 · DOI
  27. Llewellyn D, 2013, West-Wide climate risk assessment: Upper Rio Grande impact assessment
  28. 10.1016/j.jaa.2011.01.002 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/00438243.1989.9980108 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.1506494113 · DOI
  31. 10.5751/ES-03389-150331 · DOI
  32. 10.1029/2010JG001382 · DOI
  33. 10.3390/cli8040055 · DOI
  34. Rivera JA, 1998, Acequia Culture: Water, Land, and Community in the Southwest
  35. 10.4324/9780203422908-11 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/BF03376800 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1007/s10584-005-5922-3 · DOI
  38. 10.7183/0002-7316.81.1.74 · DOI
  39. Simmons M, 1972, New Mexico Historical Review, 47, 135
  40. Snow DH, 1983, Hispanic Arts and Ethnohistory in the Southwest: New Papers Inspired by the Work of E. Boyd, 347
  41. Snow DH, 1996, New Mexico’s First Colonists: The 1597-1600 Enlistments for New Mexico Under Juan de Oñate, Adelante and Gobernador
  42. 10.1016/j.jaa.2008.10.002 · DOI
  43. Spielmann KA, 2011, Sustainable Lifeways: Cultural Persistence in an Ever-Changing Environment, 180
  44. 10.1175/2008JCLI2752.1 · DOI
  45. 10.1017/aaq.2020.35 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/wcc.565 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1007/BF03376603 · DOI
  48. Trigg HB, 2005, From Household to Empire: Society and Economy in Early Colonial New Mexico
  49. 10.1073/pnas.1231335100 · DOI
  50. 10.2307/j.ctt183p8pq.8 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/BF03377300 · DOI
  52. White S, 2014, New Mexico Historical Review, 89, 425
  53. 10.1177/1469605309354399 · DOI
  54. 10.3354/cr01059 · DOI
  55. Wright AM, 2010, Leaving Mesa Verde: Peril and Change in the Thirteenth-Century Southwest, 75

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dawson, E., & Trigg, H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin, USA
  • Fiske Center for Archaeological Research, University of Massachusetts Boston, USA
Venue
The Holocene
Published
2022-09-16
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1518-1529
ISSN
  • 0959-6836
  • 1477-0911
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review