Cited by 4Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesLatin American history and cultureIndigenous Cultures and History

Dominion and improvement: The moral ecologies of colonial encounters

Trigg, Heather B, Mrozowski, Stephen A·2024·Journal of Social Archaeology

Abstract

Environmental relationships were critical to most early colonial encounters, especially for those involving permanent settlements. The ability to successfully establish a colony required developing relationships with plants, animals, and the land because they were central to providing for the colonists’ basic subsistence needs. The ways European colonizers developed these new relationships rested on their moral ecologies, a mix of beliefs and practices which give a sense of right and wrong to actions that are informed by ontologies. In this paper we use the concept of moral ecologies to explore the relationships that two empires—the British in New England and the Spanish in New Mexico—created as they established colonies that also entangled Indigenous peoples. The differences in moral ecologies between these empires and the peoples they invaded help explain tensions in the past that remain powerful today.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14696053241268640

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Albert K, 2023, Technical Analysis on the Materials from the 2011-2017 Fieldwork at La Cienega, New Mexico. Cultural Resource Management Study No. 90., 97
  2. Barrett E (2015) The Spanish Colonial Settlement Landscapes of New Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1598–1680.
  3. Cipolla C, 2007, Northeast Anthropology, 74, 41
  4. Dawson E, 2024, Winter for Eight Months, Hell for Four: Risk, Vulnerability, and Resilience on the Spanish Colonial Frontier in New Mexico
  5. Ellis G (2021) Spaces of Time: An Archaeological Perspective on the Deborah Newman Homesite. Master’s Thesis, University of Massachusetts Boston, USA.
  6. Escobar A, 2016, Revisita de Anthropolgia Iberoamericana, 11, 11
  7. 10.5744/florida/9781683401285.001.0001 · DOI
  8. Gomez P, 1985, Natural Resources Journal, 25, 1039
  9. Gould D, 2013, The Death of Prehistory, 241
  10. 10.5744/florida/9780813066219.001.0001 · DOI
  11. Gruber A, 2023, Technical Analysis on the Materials from the 2011-2017 Fieldwork at La Cienega, New Mexico. Cultural Resource Management Study No. 90., 7
  12. Hackett C, 1942, Revolt of the Pueblo Indians of New Mexico and Otermin’s Attempted Reconquest, 1680–1682. Volume II
  13. Hammond G, 1953, Don Juan de Oñate, Colonizer of New Mexico, 1595-1628
  14. Johnson M, 2006, Ideas of Landscape
  15. McBride K, 1993, Algonkians of New England: Past and Present. The Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife Annual 1991 Proceedings, 63
  16. Mrozowski S, 1994, Archaeology of Eastern North America, 22, 47
  17. Scarry C, 1990, Columbian Consequences. Volume 2, 343
  18. Slack P, 2015, The Invention of Improvement: Information and Material Progress in Seventeenth-Century England
  19. Snow D, 1992, Current Research on the Late Prehistory and Early History of New Mexico 1, 85
  20. Snow D, 1973, Cochiti Dam Salvage Project: Archaeological Excavation of the Las Majadas Site, LA 591, Cochiti Dam, New Mexico
  21. Snow D, 1973, Cochiti Dam Salvage Project: Archaeological Excavation of the Torreon Site, LA 6178, Cochiti Dam, New Mexico
  22. Torrey B, 1906, The Journal of Henry David Thoreau. Volume 10
  23. Trigg H, 2023, Technical Analysis on the Materials from the 2011-2017 Fieldwork at La Cienega, New Mexico
  24. Vasta M, 2007, What Ails Them? The Changing Faunal Utilization at the Mashantucket Pequot Reservation from the Late Woodland to the Early 19th Century
  25. Watts V, 2013, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society, 2, 20

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Trigg, H. B., & Mrozowski, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
Trigg, Heather B
Venue
Journal of Social Archaeology
Published
2024-08-02
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
246-265
ISSN
  • 1469-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2951
OpenAlex
W4401306058
Cited by
4
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Latin American history and culture
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
moral ecology, colonial encounter, environmental relations, colonialism, indigenous peoples, land use, subsistence, ontology, empire, environmental history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review