The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An exploration into the information-seeking behaviours of engineers and scientists
Abstract
This article considers findings from Master’s research that investigated the information-seeking behaviours of engineers and scientists in the workplace. The objectives of this research were to establish where engineers and scientists look for information, consider their search preferences and determine the understanding they have of online search engine operation. There is limited current research in these areas looking at engineers and scientists in the workplace. The research was undertaken using a mixed methods research methodology. A survey was conducted with engineers and scientists working in the UK, using an online questionnaire and interviews to obtain quantitative and qualitative data. Due to the small sample size (115: 58 engineers, 57 scientists) this research does not make generalisations about the wider population. The research showed both similarities and differences between engineers’ and scientists’ information-seeking behaviours. The most popular resources used by both engineers and scientists were online search engines, specialist databases and scholar search engines; and the most used sources were from within their own organisation (colleagues and documents). Electronic versions of sources were preferred over print because of their searchability; however, when an item was found it was often printed out to read. Although the main focus of this research was not information literacy it is suggested that there are significant gaps in the understanding of search engine functionality by both engineers and scientists, even though it is the most heavily used resource for information seeking. Whilst this research does not make generalisations about the wider engineer and scientist populations, potential implications for information professionals working with these groups are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The requirements for evidence synthesis are not always obvious to reviewers as they are used to navigational or exploratory searching that comes intuitively.78, 85, 86, 87”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170 · cited 1×
“The intentions of this research were to gather objective data to outline a picture of information-seeking behaviours, and to explore the identified behaviours to gain understanding so as to add detail to the picture (Johnson and Onwuegbuzie, 2004), therefore the MMR approach was followed.”
BackgroundA study of factors that affect the information‐seeking behavior of academic scientists
Niu, X., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21669 · Cited by 129
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1016/S0923-4748(01)00032-7 · DOI
- Baase S, 2013, A Gift of Fire: Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues for Computing Technology
- 10.1016/0740-8188(95)90017-9 · DOI
- Cameron R, 2011, Electronic Journal of Business Research, 9, 96
- Case DO, 2012, Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior
- 10.1108/EL-04-2014-0063 · doi:10.1108/el-04-2014-0063
- Cool C, 2000, The 63rd annual meeting of the ASIS, 462
- Creswell JW, 2014, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
- 10.1108/EUM0000000007204 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5860/crl-155 · doi:10.5860/crl-155
- 10.1126/science.1150473 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4324/9780203403303 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0306-4573(03)00003-7 · doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(03)00003-7
- 10.1108/00220410310472518 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0026041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.426 · doi:10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.426
- 10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00011-X · DOI · Paper page
- Hoggan DB (2002) Challenges, strategies, and tools for research scientists: Using web-based information resources. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship 3(3). Available at: http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v03n03/Hoggan_d01.htm (accessed 26 August 2016).
- 10.1108/14684521011036990 · DOI
- 10.1108/00012530810908184 · DOI
- 10.4103/0976-0105.141942 · DOI · Paper page
- King DW, 1994, Communication by Engineers: A Literature Review of Engineers’ Information Needs, Seeking Processes, and Use
- 10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00054-9 · doi:10.1016/s0740-8188(03)00054-9
- Lavrakas PJ (2011) Convenience Sampling. Available at: http://methods.sagepub.com/reference/encyclopedia-of-survey-research-methods/n105.xml (accessed 4 September 2017).
- 10.1086/602864 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ipm.2004.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/eb026873 · DOI
- Pickard AJ, 2013, Research Methods in Information
- 10.1300/J122v11n03_02 · DOI
- 10.1300/J122v21n03_09 · DOI
- Robinson MA, 2010, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 640, 10.1002/asi.21290 · DOI
- 10.1108/01409171211210154 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/MRR-02-2013-0027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.29085/9781856049740 · doi:10.29085/9781856049740
- Tucci VK (2011) Assessing information-seeking behavior of computer science and engineering faculty. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 64(winter). Available at: http://www.istl.org/11-winter/refereed5.html (accessed 26 August 2016). · DOI
- 10.1080/0194262X.2015.1090941 · DOI
Cited by
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1378 · Cited by 2,379
Tenopir, C., Christian, L., & Kaufman, J. (2019) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications7010018 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Wellings, S., & Casselden, B.
- Affiliations
- Northumbria University, UK
- Venue
- Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-11-26
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 789-800
- ISSN
- 0961-0006
- 1741-6477
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An exploration into the information-seeking behaviours of engineers and scientists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0961000617742466
- The paper
- Wellings, S., & Casselden, B. (2019). An exploration into the information-seeking behaviours of engineers and scientists. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617742466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.