Cited by 16Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Anti-cardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies: normal reference ranges in northwestern Italy

Montaruli, B, De Luna, E, Mengozzi, G, Molinari, F, Napolitano, E, Napoli, P, Nicolo, C, Romito, A +5 more·2012·Lupus

Abstract

Laboratory tests for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β2glycoprotein I antibodies (a-β2GPI) face problems common to many autoantibody assays: the lack of a reference standard and the need for each laboratory to assess assay-specific cut-off values. The aims of the study were to evaluate the reference range upper limits (99th percentile) used for aCL and a-β2GPI in the northwest of Italy and to investigate the analytical performances of these assays with the newly obtained reference ranges. We assayed aCL and a-β2GPI in 104 serum samples from patients without a history of thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, tumours, infections and/or autoimmune diseases (30 males and 74 non-pregnant females). We tested all the commercial assays available in our regions (i.e. Orgentec Diagnostika, Aesku Diagnostics and Inova Diagnostics ELISA; CliA Zenit-RA and EliA Phadia Laboratory Systems). A further 30 serum samples, including 10 from healthy subjects, 10 from antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients and 10 from septic patients were assessed to investigate the analytical performance of the obtained cut-off limits. Reference range upper limits obtained with the commercial kits differ among assays and from the values reported by the manufacturer. Moreover, normal reference ranges calculated for IgG and IgM aCL differed from the arbitrary selected laboratory classification values suggested in the guidelines of 40 GPL and MPL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0961203312442260

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montaruli, B., De Luna, E., Mengozzi, G., Molinari, F., Napolitano, E., Napoli, P., Nicolo, C., Romito, A., Stella, S., Bazzan, M., Bertero, M., Carignola, R., & Marchese, C.
Affiliations
  • Regional Network for Rare Diseases. APS Piedmont Consortium, Italy
  • GAL (Gruppo Autoimmunita’ di Laboratorio del Piemonte e della Valle d’Aosta), Italy
Venue
Lupus
Published
2012-05-25
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
799-801
ISSN
  • 0961-2033 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0962
OpenAlex
W2100567310
Cited by
16
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lupus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, reference values, antiphospholipid syndrome, analytical performance, IgM and IgG antibodies, sepsis, thrombosis, commercial ELISA kits, northwestern Italy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Autoantibodies, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, beta 2-Glycoprotein I, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review