The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participation and Environmental Governance: Consensus, Ambivalence and Debate
Open accessAbstract
During the past four decades the governance of environmental problems – the definition of issues and their political and practical resolution – has evolved to include a wider range of stakeholders in more extensive open discussions. In the introduction to this issue of Environmental Values on ‘Environment, Policy and Participation’, we outline some features of these recent developments in participatory environmental governance, indicate some key questions that arise, and give an overview of the collection of papers in this special issue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process
Hajer, M. A. (1997) · doi:10.1093/019829333x.001.0001 · Cited by 4,184
The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-1513 · Cited by 2,233
Blake, J. (1999) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839908725599 · Cited by 1,289
Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science
Dryzek, J. S. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139173810 · Cited by 1,181
Discursive democracy politics, policy and political science
Dryzek, J. S. (1990) · Cited by 1,092
Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology
Peet, R. (1997) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/s0743-0167(97)00033-8 · Cited by 1,064
Weale, A. (1991) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 769
Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change
Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A. P. J. (1992) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941929209380797 · Cited by 706
Self-citationSpace, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance
Macleod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913299669861026 · Cited by 541
Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology
Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., & Wynne, B. (1998) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446221983 · Cited by 505
Cited by
Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., de Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner‐Ries, D., Huber, T., Neumann, R. K., Oughton, E. A., Sidoli del Ceno, J., et al. (2018) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12541 · Cited by 746
Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action?
(2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108284646 · Cited by 426
Equity and Justice in Polycentric Climate Governance
Okereke, C. (2018) · Governing Climate Change · doi:10.1017/9781108284646.019 · Cited by 43
Patrimonialities: Heritage vs. Property
Hafstein, V. T., & Skrydstrup, M. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108933629 · Cited by 29
Mitchell, R. E., & Leach, B. (2019) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1832 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Bulkeley, H., & Mol, A. P. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Values
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-154
- ISSN
- 0963-2719 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2114728864
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participation and Environmental Governance: Consensus, Ambivalence and Debate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/096327190301200201
- The paper
- Bulkeley, H., & Mol, A. P. J. (2003). Participation and Environmental Governance: Consensus, Ambivalence and Debate. Environmental Values. https://doi.org/10.1177/096327190301200201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
