The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common Knowledge? Public Understanding of Climate Change in Newcastle, Australia
Abstract
This paper argues that public understanding of climate change not only involves knowledge of its physical processes, but also encompasses wider issues concerning the relation between society and nature. It examines the conclusions of previous research, and assumptions made within the policy community concerning public understanding of climate change. It is argued that in each case, in accordance with the information deficit model, recorded levels of ignorance are seen as a barrier to effective public involvement in the policy process. This view is challenged by research findings from Newcastle, Australia. Public understanding of global environmental issues drew not only on scientific information, but also on local knowledges, values, and moral responsibilities. Further, respondents connected the issue to their communities, and suggested that individual action is morally sanctioned, despite concerns for the efficacy of such action and the lack of government or industry support. Where institutional realignment has occurred to provide renewable energy to householders, public involvement has been forthcoming. These findings suggest that rather than focus on the provision of information, policy attention should be directed to the social and institutional barriers that act to constrain public involvement in addressing global environmental issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beck, U. (1996) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276496013004001 · Cited by 397
Public identification with sustainable development
Macnaghten, P., & Jacobs, M. (1997) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/s0959-3780(96)00023-4 · Cited by 244
Cited by
Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004 · Cited by 2,026
What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts
Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002 · Cited by 1,073
Wolf, J., & Moser, S. C. (2011) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.120 · Cited by 696
Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A., & Langer, G. (2009) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x · Cited by 559
Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution
Bickerstaff, K. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001 · Cited by 472
Metadata
- Authors
- Bulkeley, H.
- Venue
- Public Understanding of Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 313-333
- ISSN
- 0963-6625 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6609
- OpenAlex
- W2551283346
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common Knowledge? Public Understanding of Climate Change in Newcastle, Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/096366250000900301
- The paper
- Bulkeley, H. (2000). Common Knowledge? Public Understanding of Climate Change in Newcastle, Australia. Public Understanding of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/096366250000900301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.