The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in‐depth studies across the world
Abstract
Public understandings and perceptions of, as well as engagement with, climate change have garnered the interest of research and policy for almost three decades. A portion of this growing body of literature examines such perceptions in‐depth, using largely qualitative methodologies, such as personal interviews, limited sample size surveys, focus groups, and case studies. This area of research has been conducted on different continents, with individuals of different cultural backgrounds and ethnic groups, and a variety of demographic characteristics. It has examined various aspects of the communication process, such as audience differences, influence of framing, messages and messengers, information processing, etc.). This paper focuses on this subset of the climate change literature, highlighting similarities and differences across cultural, social, and geographical landscapes. Apart from demographic and regional differences, this literature also offers more detailed insights into the effectiveness of different communication strategies and into the cognitive and psychological processes that underlie public opinions. These insights are generally not obtained through large‐scale opinion surveys. Our review highlights great variation and sometimes direct contradiction between these pieces of research. This not only points to a need for further refinement in our knowledge of public understanding and engagement, but also simply to accept that no one theory will explain the variation in human experience of climate change and action in response to it.WIREs Clim Change 2011 2 547–569 DOI: 10.1002/wcc.120 This article is categorized under:Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Perceptions of Climate Change
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504620220145401 · Cited by 8,866
KLEPEIS, N. E., NELSON, W. C., OTT, W. R., ROBINSON, J. P., TSANG, A. M., SWITZER, P., BEHAR, J. V., HERN, S. C., & ENGELMANN, W. H. (2001) · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165 · Cited by 4,803
REDISCOVERY OF TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AS ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:roteka]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,206
Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x · Cited by 3,885
Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach
Roberts, A., Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1994) · Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques · doi:10.2307/3551961 · Cited by 3,628
Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity
Hulme, M. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841200 · Cited by 2,563
Slovic, P. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315661773 · Cited by 2,217
Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values
Leiserowitz, A. (2006) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9 · Cited by 2,197
Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004 · Cited by 2,026
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003 · Cited by 1,765
Cited by
Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health
Watts, N., Adger, W. N., Agnolucci, P., Blackstock, J., Byass, P., Cai, W., Chaytor, S., Colbourn, T., Collins, M., Cooper, A., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60854-6 · Cited by 2,055
Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values
Corner, A., Markowitz, E., & Pidgeon, N. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.269 · Cited by 418
“…that communication strategies based on ‘one way’ message-oriented communication tend to be ineffective at fostering significant and sustained behavioral engagement 87,105,106 They may also promote polarized views through ‘biased assimilation’ of the message content by opposing attitudinal groups.”
BackgroundWhat Is Climate Change Education?
Stevenson, R. B., Nicholls, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2017) · Curriculum Perspectives · doi:10.1007/s41297-017-0015-9 · Cited by 316
Léger-Goodes, T., Malboeuf-Hurtubise, C., Mastine, T., Généreux, M., Paradis, P.-O., & Camden, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872544 · Cited by 299
Can public awareness, knowledge and engagement improve climate change adaptation policies?
Khatibi, F. S., Dedekorkut-Howes, A., Howes, M., & Torabi, E. (2021) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-021-00024-z · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, J., & Moser, S. C.
- Venue
- WIREs Climate Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-17
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-569
- ISSN
- 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-7799
- OpenAlex
- W2169771737
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 134
- FWCI
- 62.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in‐depth studies across the world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wcc.120
- The paper
- Wolf, J., & Moser, S. C. (2011). Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in‐depth studies across the world. WIREs Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.