The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cell Transplantation for Myocardial Repair: An Experimental Approach
Open accessAbstract
Myocardium lacks the ability to regenerate following injury. This is in contrast to skeletal muscle (SKM), in which capacity for tissue repair is attributed to the presence of satellite cells. It was hypothesized that SKM satellite cells multiplied in vitro could be used to repair injured heart muscle. Fourteen dogs underwent explantation of the anterior tibialis muscle. Satellite cells were multiplied in vitro and their nuclei were labelled with tritiated thymidine 24 h prior to implantation. The same dogs were then subjected successfully to a myocardial injury by the application of a cryoprobe. The cells were suspended in serum-free growth medium and autotransplanted within the damaged muscle. Medium without cells was injected into an adjacent site to serve as a control. Endpoints comprised histology using standard stains as well as Masson trichrome (specific for connective tissue), and radioautography. In five dogs, satellite cell isolation, culture, and implantation were technically satisfactory. In three implanted dogs, specimens were taken within 6-8 wk. There were persistence of the implantation channels in the experimental sites when compared to the controls. Macroscopically, muscle tissue completely surrounded by scar tissue could be seen. Masson trichrome staining showed homogeneous scar in the control site, but not in the test site where a patch of muscle fibres containing intercalated discs (characteristic of myocardial tissue) was observed. In two other dogs, specimens were taken at 14 wk postimplantation. Muscle tissue could not be found. These preliminary results could be consistent with the hypothesis that SKM satellite cells can form neo-myocardium within an appropriate environment. Our specimens failed to demonstrate the presence of myocyte nuclei. It is therefore further hypothesized that in the late postoperative period, the muscle regenerate failed to survive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Langer, R., & Vacanti, J. P. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8493529 · Cited by 9,893
Regenerating functional myocardium: Improved performance after skeletal myoblast transplantation
Taylor, D. A., Atkins, B. Z., Hungspreugs, P., Jones, T. R., Reedy, M. C., Hutcheson, K. A., Glower, D. D., & Kraus, W. E. (1998) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0898-929 · Cited by 1,152
Laflamme, M. A., & Murry, C. E. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1117 · Cited by 964
Systems approaches to preventing transplanted cell death in cardiac repair
Robey, T. E., Saiget, M. K., Reinecke, H., & Murry, C. E. (2008) · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.03.009 · Cited by 404
Murry, C. E., Reinecke, H., & Pabon, L. M. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.002 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Marelli, D., Desrosiers, C., El-Alfy, M., Kao, R. L., & Chiu, R. C.-J.
- Venue
- Cell Transplantation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 383-390
- ISSN
- 0963-6897 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-3892
- OpenAlex
- W189185435
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell Transplantation for Myocardial Repair: An Experimental Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/096368979200100602
- The paper
- Marelli, D., Desrosiers, C., El-Alfy, M., Kao, R. L., & Chiu, R. C.-J. (1992). Cell Transplantation for Myocardial Repair: An Experimental Approach. Cell Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1177/096368979200100602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.