The Teenage Brain: Cognitive Control and Motivation
Open accessAbstract
Adolescence is associated with heightened mortality rates due in large measure to negative consequences from risky behaviors. Theories of adolescent risk taking posit that it is driven by immature cognitive control coupled with heightened reward reactivity, yet surprisingly few empirical studies have examined these neurobiological systems together. In this article, we describe a series of studies from our laboratory aimed at further delineating the maturation of cognitive control through adolescence, as well as how rewards influence a key aspect of cognitive control: response inhibition. Our findings indicate that adolescents can exert adult-like control over their behavior but that they have limitations regarding the consistency with which they can generate optimal responses compared with adults. Moreover, we demonstrate that the brain circuitry supporting mature cognitive (inhibitory) control is still undergoing development. Our work using the rewarded antisaccade task, a paradigm that enables concurrent assessment of rewards and inhibitory control, indicates that adolescents show delayed but heightened responses in key reward regions along with concurrent activation in brain systems that support behaviors leading to reward acquisition. Considered together, our results highlight adolescent-specific differences in the integration of basic brain processes that may underlie decision making and more complex risk taking in adolescence.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brain circuitry supporting cognitive control is still developing during adolescence, partly due to differential development of limbic and executive control systems.
“Brain circuitry supporting cognitive control is still undergoing development during adolescence87, in part owing to differential development of limbic and executive control systems88.”
From Cognitive and behavioural flexibility: Neural mechanisms and clinical considerations (2021) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 92
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Luna B Padmanabhan A O’Hearn K 2010 What has fMRI told us about the Development of Cognitive Control through Adolescence? Brain and Cognition 72 101 113 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.005 -Detailed discussion on interpreting findings from developmental neuroimaging studies on cognitive control 19765880 PMC2815087 · DOI · Paper page
- Wahlstrom D White T Luciana M 2010 Neurobehavioral evidence for changes in dopamine system activity during adolescence Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 34 5 631 648 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.007 -Review on the development of the dopamine system and how it may relate to adolescent brain development and behavior 20026110 PMC2845533 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Luna, B., Paulsen, D. J., Padmanabhan, A., & Geier, C.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 94-100
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC4285389
- OpenAlex
- W2136032578
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080243)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA031111)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- adolescence, cognitive control, response inhibition, reward reactivity, risk-taking, brain maturation, decision-making, reward processing, inhibitory control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review