Cited by 277Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Neurobehavioral evidence for changes in dopamine system activity during adolescence

Open access
Wahlstrom, Dustin, White, Tonya, Luciana, Monica·2010·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Human adolescence has been characterized by increases in risk-taking, emotional lability, and deficient patterns of behavioral regulation. These behaviors have often been attributed to changes in brain structure that occur during this developmental period, notably alterations in gray and white matter that impact synaptic architecture in frontal, limbic, and striatal regions. In this review, we provide a rationale for considering that these behaviors may be due to changes in dopamine system activity, particularly overactivity, during adolescence relative to either childhood or adulthood. This rationale relies on animal data due to limitations in assessing neurochemical activity more directly in juveniles. Accordingly, we also present a strategy that incorporates molecular genetic techniques to infer the status of the underlying tone of the dopamine system across developmental groups. Implications for the understanding of adolescent behavioral development are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.007

Cites

269 of 269 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Childhood and adolescence are sensitive periods in which these neurobiological systems develop and change, making young people particularly vulnerable to insult.

    “Childhood and adolescence are sensitive periods in which these systems develop and change [26–29], making them particularly vulnerable to insult.”

    From Psychological impacts of “screen time” and “green time” for children and adolescents: A systematic scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction describes adolescence as a period of neurochemical and brain-maturation changes and heightened vulnerability to psychiatric disorders. The Conclusions describe substantial changes in the dopamine system during adolescence. The paper does not establish that childhood is likewise a sensitive period or that these changes make young people particularly vulnerable to insult. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These neurobiological changes underlie profound maturation in motivational and cognitive domains across adolescence.

    “These neurobiological changes underlie the profound maturation in motivational and cognitive domains across adolescence [30–34]”
  • Recent studies indicate that changes in dopaminergic innervation have more influence on circuitry development during adolescence.

    “recent studies have indicated changes in dopaminergic innervation to have more influence on circuitry development during adolescence”

    From Developmental Changes in Organization of Structural Brain Networks (2013) · cites this paper as Wahlstrom et al. 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bassett AS Chow EWC 22q11 deletion syndrome: a genetic subtype of schizophrenia Biological Psychiatry 1992 46 7 882 891 10509171 PMC3276595
  2. Jones EG Peters A Jones EG Laminar distribution of cortical efferent cells Cerebral Cortex 1984 1 521 553 Plenum Press New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wahlstrom, D., White, T., & Luciana, M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Luciana, Monica
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
631-648
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102081573
Cited by
277
References
263
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 13
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH017069)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017843)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
dopaminergic system, adolescence, neurobehavioral development, risk-taking, emotional lability, behavioral regulation, synaptic structure, striatum, frontal cortex, limbic system, white matter, gray matter, animal models, molecular genetics
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Animals, Behavior, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Dopamine, Humans, Human Development, Models, Neurological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review