Cited by 113Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

The Developmental Origins of Selective Social Learning

Open access
Poulin-Dubois, Diane, Brosseau-Liard, Patricia·2016·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

The study of children’s social learning is a topic of central importance to our understanding of human development. Learning from others allows children to acquire information efficiently; however, not all information conveyed by others is accurate or worth learning. A large body of research conducted over the past decade has shown that preschoolers learn selectively from some individuals over others. In the present article, we summarize our work and that of others on the developmental origins of selective social learning during infancy. The results of these studies indicate that infants are sensitive to a number of cues, including competence, age, and confidence, when deciding from whom to learn. We highlight the important implications of this research for our understanding of the cognitive and social skills necessary for selective learning and point out promising avenues for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721415613962

Cites

41 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mills C. (2013). (See References). An article that provides a comprehensive review of the past decade of research examining children’s selective social learning.
  2. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.06.05 · DOI
  3. Ryalls B. O., 2000, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 188

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 113

Metadata

Authors
Poulin-Dubois, D., & Brosseau-Liard, P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, Concordia University
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2016-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
60-64
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2339621095
Cited by
113
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6
FWCI
26.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • University of Ottawa - Library
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD068458)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
social learning, infant learning, developmental origins, learning from others, social cues, preschool children, social cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review