Cited by 348Language Development and DisordersCategorization, perception, and languageReading and Literacy Development

Statistical Learning: From Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules

Open access
Aslin, Richard N., Newport, Elissa L.·2012·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Statistical learning is a rapid and robust mechanism that enables adults and infants to extract patterns embedded in both language and visual domains. Statistical learning operates implicitly, without instruction, through mere exposure to a set of input stimuli. However, much of what learners must acquire about a structured domain consists of principles or rules that can be applied to novel inputs. It has been claimed that statistical learning and rule learning are separate mechanisms; in this article, however, we review evidence and provide a unifying perspective that argues for a single statistical-learning mechanism that accounts for both the learning of input stimuli and the generalization of learned patterns to novel instances. The balance between instance-learning and generalization is based on two factors: the strength of perceptual and cognitive biases that highlight structural regularities, and the consistency of elements’ contexts (unique vs. overlapping) in the input.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721412436806

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In implicit statistical learning tasks, participants can differentiate well-formed sequences from those that are not, but cannot verbalize the basis for their judgments.

    “Studies found that participants can differentiate well-formed sequences from those that are not, but cannot verbalize the basis for their judgments (Aslin & Newport, 2012;Romberg & Saffran, 2010).”

    From Mind Your Step (by Step): Chain-of-Thought can Reduce Performance on Tasks where Thinking Makes Humans Worse (2024) · cites this paper as Aslin & Newport, 2012

    In “Statistical learning in language and vision” (page unavailable), the paper reports that learners discriminate words from other syllable sequences and do so without awareness of computing the relevant statistic. It describes these as implicit decisions, but does not report that participants were unable to verbalize the basis for their judgments. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Abla D Katahira K Okanoya K 2008 On-line assessment of statistical learning by event-related potentials Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 952 964 18211232
  2. Abla D Okanoya K 2008 Statistical segmentation of tone sequences activates the left inferior frontal cortex: A near-infrared spectroscopy study Neuropsychologia 46 2787 2795 18579166
  3. Austin A Newport EL 2011 When children learn more than they are taught: Regularization in child and adult learners Manuscript under review
  4. Bulf H Johnson SP Valenza E 2011 Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant Cognition 121 127 132 21745660
  5. Chomsky N 1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax Cambridge MA MIT Press
  6. Chomsky N 1995 The minimalist program Cambridge MA MIT Press
  7. Creel SC Newport EL Aslin RN 2004 Distant melodies: Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in tone sequences Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 1119 1130 15355140
  8. Croft W 2002 Typology and universals Aronoff M Rees-Miller J The Blackwell Handbook of Linguistics 2nd Oxford Basil Blackwell
  9. Culbertson J Legendre G 2011 Investigating the evolution of agreement systems using an artificial language learning paradigm Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics 2010
  10. Culbertson J Smolensky P Legendre G 2011 Learning biases predict a word order universal Manuscript under review 22208785
  11. Dawson C Gerken LA 2009 From domain-generality to domain-sensitivity: 4-Month-olds learn an abstract repetition rule in music that 7-month-olds do not Cognition 111 378 382 19338982 PMC2680471
  12. Endress AD Bonatti LL 2007 Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream Cognition 105 247 299 17083927
  13. Endress AD Nespor M Mehler J 2009 Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 348 353 19647474
  14. Fedzechkina M Jaeger T Newport E 2011 Functional biases in language learning: Evidence from word order and case-marking interaction Carlson L Hölscher C Shipley T Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Austin, TX Cognitive Science Society
  15. Finley S Badecker W 2009 Vowel harmony and feature-based representations Journal of Memory and Language 61 423 437
  16. Fiser J Aslin RN 2002 Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 15822 15826 PMC137800 12429858
  17. Gebhart AL Newport EL Aslin RN 2009 Statistical learning of adjacent and non-adjacent dependencies among non-linguistic sounds Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16 486 490 19451373 PMC2799498
  18. Gerken LA 2006 Decisions, decisions: Infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible Cognition 98 B67 B74 15992791
  19. Gervain J Macagno F Cogoi S Pena M Mehler M 2008 The neonate brain detects speech structure Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 14222 14227 PMC2544605 18768785
  20. Gomez RL Gerken LA 1999 Artificial grammar learning by one-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge Cognition 70 109 135 10349760
  21. Greenberg J 1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements Greenberg J Universals of language 73 113 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
  22. Hudson Kam CL Newport EL 2009 Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages Cognitive Psychology 59 30 66 19324332 PMC2703698
  23. Johnson SP Fernandes KJ Frank MC Kirkham NZ Marcus GF Rabagliati H Slemmer JA 2009 Abstract rule learning for visual sequences in 8- and 11-month-olds Infancy 14 2 18 19283080 PMC2654175
  24. Karuza E Newport EL Aslin RN Davis S Tivarus M Bavelier D 2011 Neural correlates of statistical learning in a word segmentation task: An fMRI study Neurobiology of Language Conference Annapolis, MD PMC3750089 23312790
  25. Kirkham NZ Slemmer JA Johnson SP 2002 Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism Cognition 83 B35 B42 11869728
  26. Marcus GF Fernandes KJ Johnson SP 2007 Infant rule learning facilitated by speech Psychological Science 18 387 391 17576276
  27. Marcus GF Vijayan S BandiRao S Vishton PM 1999 Rule learning in 7-month-old infants Science 283 77 80 9872745
  28. Maye J Werker JF Gerken L 2002 Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination Cognition 82 B101 B111 11747867
  29. Maye J Weiss DJ Aslin RN 2008 Statistical phonetic learning in infants: Facilitation and feature generalization Developmental Science 11 122 134 18171374
  30. McNealy K Mazziotta JC Dapretto M 2006 Cracking the language code: Neural mechanisms underlying speech parsing Journal of Neuroscience 26 7629 7639 16855090 PMC3713232
  31. McNealy K Mazziotta JC Dapretto M 2010 The neural basis of speech parsing in children and adults Developmental Science 13 385 406 20136936 PMC3229831
  32. Newport EL Aslin RN 2004 Learning at a distance: I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies Cognitive Psychology 48 127 162 14732409
  33. Orban G Fiser J Aslin RN Lengyel M 2008 Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observers Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 2745 2750 PMC2268207 18268353
  34. Reeder PA Newport EL Aslin RN 2009 The role of distributional information in linguistic category formation Taatgen N van Rijn H Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Austin TX Cognitive Science Society
  35. Reeder PA Newport EL Aslin RN 2010 Novel words in novel contexts: The role of distributional information in form-class category learning Ohlsson S Catrambone R Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Austin, TX Cognitive Science Society
  36. Saffran JR Aslin RN Newport EL 1996 Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants Science 274 1926 1928 8943209
  37. Saffran JR Pollak SD Seibel RL Shkolnik AA 2007 Dog is a dog is a dog: Infant rule learning is not specific to language Cognition 105 669 680 17188676 PMC2066190
  38. Teinonen T Fellman V Naatanen R Alku P Huotilainen M 2009 Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials BMC Neuroscience 10 21 19284661 PMC2670827
  39. Tily H Frank MC Jaeger TF 2011 The learnability of constructed languages reflects typological patterns Carlson L Hölscher C Shipley T Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Austin, TX Cognitive Science Society
  40. Turk-Browne NB Scholl BJ Chun MM Johnson MK 2009 Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21 1934 1945 18823241 PMC2773825
  41. Xu F Tenenbaum JB 2007 Word learning as Bayesian inference Psychological Review 114 245 272 17500627
  42. Gerken LA 2010 Infants use rational decision criteria for choosing among models of their input Cognition 115 362 366 20144828 PMC2835817
  43. Gervain J Mehler J 2010 Speech perception and language acquisition in the first year of life Annual Review of Psychology 61 191 218 19575623
  44. Hay JF Pelucchi B Graf Estes K Saffran JR 2011 Linking sounds to meanings: Infant statistical learning in a natural language Cognitive Psychology 63 93 106 21762650 PMC3143199
  45. Johnson SP 2010 How infants learn about the visual world Cognitive Science 34 1158 1184 21116440 PMC2992385

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester
  • University of Rochester (US)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2012-05-30
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
170-176
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2136401406
Cited by
348
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
42.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC000167)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD037082)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
statistical learning, implicit learning, rule induction, perceptual bias, structural regularity, language acquisition, infant language acquisition, context consistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review