The Pitfalls and Promise of Increasing Racial Diversity: Threat, Contact, and Race Relations in the 21st Century
Open accessAbstract
A decades-long trend toward greater racial and ethnic diversity in the United States is expected to continue, with White Americans projected to constitute less than 50% of the national population by mid century. The present review integrates recent empirical research on the effects of making this population change salient with research on how actual diversity affects Whites Americans’ intergroup attitudes and behavior. Specifically, we offer a framework for understanding and predicting the effects of anticipated increases in racial diversity that highlights the competing influences of intergroup concerns, such as relative group status and power, and more interpersonal experiences, such as positive contact, on intergroup relations. We close with a discussion of the likely moderators of the effects of the increasing national racial diversity and consider implications of this societal change for racial equity in the 21st century.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Republican Party's use of restrictive nationalist rhetoric in the twenty-first century is almost certainly linked to demographic shifts (such as the relative increase in the non-white population) in the context of a plurality electoral system with two major parties.
“For example, the Republican Party’s use of restrictive nationalist rhetoric in the twenty-first century286 is almost certainly linked to demographic shifts (such as the relative increase in the non-white population63) in the context of a plurality electoral system with two major parties.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [63]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 213
- Authors
- Craig, M. A., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Craig, Maureen A.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-12-19
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 188-193
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2780301396
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 29.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- racial diversity, demographic change, intergroup relations, intergroup contact, relative status, racial equity, White Americans, intergroup attitudes, ethnic diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review