Cited by 213Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchMigration, Refugees, and Integration

The Pitfalls and Promise of Increasing Racial Diversity: Threat, Contact, and Race Relations in the 21st Century

Open access
Craig, Maureen A., Rucker, Julian M., Richeson, Jennifer A.·2018·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

A decades-long trend toward greater racial and ethnic diversity in the United States is expected to continue, with White Americans projected to constitute less than 50% of the national population by mid century. The present review integrates recent empirical research on the effects of making this population change salient with research on how actual diversity affects Whites Americans’ intergroup attitudes and behavior. Specifically, we offer a framework for understanding and predicting the effects of anticipated increases in racial diversity that highlights the competing influences of intergroup concerns, such as relative group status and power, and more interpersonal experiences, such as positive contact, on intergroup relations. We close with a discussion of the likely moderators of the effects of the increasing national racial diversity and consider implications of this societal change for racial equity in the 21st century.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721417727860

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Republican Party's use of restrictive nationalist rhetoric in the twenty-first century is almost certainly linked to demographic shifts (such as the relative increase in the non-white population) in the context of a plurality electoral system with two major parties.

    “For example, the Republican Party’s use of restrictive nationalist rhetoric in the twenty-first century286 is almost certainly linked to demographic shifts (such as the relative increase in the non-white population63) in the context of a plurality electoral system with two major parties.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 213

Authors
Craig, M. A., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Craig, Maureen A.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2017-12-19
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
188-193
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2780301396
Cited by
213
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
29.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
racial diversity, demographic change, intergroup relations, intergroup contact, relative status, racial equity, White Americans, intergroup attitudes, ethnic diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review