CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 150Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consent and Assent to Participate in Research from People with Dementia

Slaughter, Susan, Cole, Dixie, Jennings, Eileen, Reimer, Marlene A·2007·Nursing Ethics
DOI 10.1177/0969733007071355
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Conducting research with vulnerable populations involves careful attention to the interests of individuals. Although it is generally understood that informed consent is a necessary prerequisite to research participation, it is less clear how to proceed when potential research participants lack the capacity to provide this informed consent. The rationale for assessing the assent or dissent of vulnerable individuals and obtaining informed consent by authorized representatives is discussed. Practical guidelines for recruitment of and data collection from people in the middle or late stage of dementia are proposed. These guidelines were used by research assistants in a minimal risk study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0969733007071355

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Canadian Study of Health and Aging Working Group, 1994, CMAJ, 150, 899
  2. Statistics Canada, 2000, Projections of population and families for Canada, the provinces and territories
  3. Gwyther LP, 1997, Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 11, 18
  4. Alzheimer Society of Canada, 2004, Alzheimer care ethical guidelines: participation in research
  5. Lawton MP, 1997, Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 11, 91
  6. Dresser R., 2001, Georgia Law Rev, 35, 661
  7. 2003, Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans
  8. National Advisory Council on Aging, 2004, The NACA position on Alzheimer disease and related dementias
  9. Malloy DW, 1998, Capacity to decide
  10. Ki SYH, 2002, Am J Psychiatry, 158, 712
  11. 2003, Dependent Adults Act
  12. 2003, Personal Directives Act
  13. Weisstub DN, 1998, Health Law Can, 18, 95
  14. Dresser R., 1994, Rutgers Law Rev, 46, 609
  15. Hunter K, 2003, J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 30, 241

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 150

Related

Metadata

Authors
Slaughter, S., Cole, D., Jennings, E., & Reimer, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Calgary Health Region (CA)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Slaughter, Susan
ORCID
Slaughter, Susan
Venue
Nursing Ethics
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2007-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
27-40
ISSN
  • 0969-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0989
DOI
10.1177/0969733007071355
OpenAlex
W2064863415
Cited by
150
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Nursing Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alzheimer Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
informed consent, research participation, dementia, assent, dissent, vulnerable populations, research ethics, research recruitment, data collection, authorized representatives, minimal risk research
MeSH terms
Aged, Canada, Dementia, Family, Female, Humans, Human Experimentation, Informed Consent, Nursing Assessment, Patient Advocacy, Research Personnel, Geriatric Assessment, Mental Competency, Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection, Third-Party Consent, Principle-Based Ethics, Comprehension, Ethics, Research, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review