Cited by 58Ethics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative and Oncologic CarePhilosophical Ethics and Theory

A Conceptual and Moral Analysis of Suffering

Carnevale, Franco A·2009·Nursing Ethics

Abstract

This analysis presents an epistemological and moral examination of suffering. It addresses the specific questions: (1) What is suffering? (2) Can one's suffering be assessed by another? and (3) What is the moral significance of suffering? The epistemological analysis is orientated by Peter Hacker's framework for the investigation of emotions, demonstrating that suffering is an emotion. This leads to a discussion of whether suffering is a phenomenon that can be evaluated objectively by another person who is not experiencing the suffering, questioning the validity of some decisional models for limiting life-sustaining therapies with the aim of preventing suffering. This analysis highlights that understandings of suffering are value laden. It is conventionally implied that suffering is `bad' and that it should be eliminated. Suffering is commonly regarded as a moral wrong that needs to be made right by health care. This article concludes with a recommendation for a paradigm shift in how suffering can be better understood, through the practice of empathic attunement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0969733008100076

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carnevale, F. A.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Carnevale, Franco A
Venue
Nursing Ethics
Published
2009-03
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
173-183
ISSN
  • 0969-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0989
OpenAlex
W2161589481
Cited by
58
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
suffering, Peter Hacker, epistemology of emotions, value-laden concepts, end-of-life care, empathic attunement
MeSH terms
Bioethics, Emotions, Humans, Morals, Stress, Psychological, Knowledge, Ethical Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review