Cited by 17Ethics in medical practiceEthics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative and Oncologic Care

Ethical difficulties in healthcare: A comparison between physicians and nurses

Leuter, Cinzia, La Cerra, Carmen, Calisse, Santina, Dosa, Danila, Petrucci, Cristina, Lancia, Loreto·2018·Nursing Ethics

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Advances in biomedical sciences, technologies and care practices have resulted in an increase in ethical problems and a resulting growth of difficulties encountered by health workers in their professional activity. OBJECTIVE:: The main objective of this study was to analyse knowledge in the ethical field and experience with and the propensity for using ethics consultations by nurses and physicians. METHODS:: Between March and June 2014, a cross-sectional observational study was conducted on a sample of 351 nurses and 128 physicians in four central Italian hospitals. For data collection, a semi-structured questionnaire was used, consisting of 21 items divided into four sections exploring (1) demographic and occupational characteristics, (2) knowledge in the ethics field, (3) experience with ethical issues and (4) the propensity to use ethics consultation. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:: Research ethics approval was obtained from the Italian Nurses Professional Board. RESULTS:: The results show that both nurses and physicians are faced with ethically sensitive situations. Nurses were found to have better judgement concerning their own knowledge than physicians, but more physicians were found to have a deeper level of specific training in ethics issues. The propensity to ask for ethics consultations to address ethical issues was found to be significantly associated with the degree to which ethical issues have deepened (and the level of experience acquired in this field). CONCLUSION:: The presence of a consulting service that can lead to shared choices may represent, together with basic and continuing education, a valid support for professional growth in the ethical field for both physicians and nurses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0969733016687158

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leuter, C., La Cerra, C., Calisse, S., Dosa, D., Petrucci, C., & Lancia, L.
Affiliations
  • University of L’Aquila, Italy
  • Civilian Hospital, Avezzano, Italy
  • Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia (IT)
  • University of L'Aquila (IT)
Corresponding author
Lancia, Loreto
Venue
Nursing Ethics
Published
2017-01-18
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1064-1074
ISSN
  • 0969-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0989
OpenAlex
W2573014561
Cited by
17
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
health care ethics, ethical decision-making, ethics consultation, nurses, physicians, ethical knowledge, ethical training, professional ethics education
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Surveys and Questionnaires, Knowledge, Ethics Consultation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review