Cited by 44Ethics in medical practiceEthics in Business and EducationEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Effects of an ethical empowerment program on critical care nurses’ ethical decision-making

Jamshidian, Fatemeh, Shahriari, Mohsen, Aderyani, Mohsen Rezaei·2019·Nursing Ethics

Abstract

Background: Nurses require empowerment if they are to make ethical decisions. Ethical empowerment has always been one of the main concerns in nurse training programs. Research aim: The present study was conducted to determine the effect of an ethical empowerment program on critical care nurses’ ethical decision-making. Research design: This is a clinical trial study with two groups and pre and post design. Participants and research context: In this study, 60 nurses working in Intensive Care Unit were selected through random sampling and then divided into a control and an experimental group after filling out the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire. Both groups completed the questionnaire again immediately and 2 months after the ethical empowerment workshop had been held for the experimental group. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS-16 using descriptive and inferential statistics. Ethical considerations: The goals of the study were explained to the participants and then a written informed consent was received from them. Findings: The results showed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of their ethical sensitivity scores at the beginning of the study; however, immediately and 2 months after the intervention, the mean score increased significantly in the experimental group. Moreover, the scores obtained 2 months after the workshop increased compared to the pre-intervention scores but showed a drop compared to the scores reported immediately after the workshop. Discussion: The ethical empowerment program, given to the critical care nurses in this study, improved their ethical sensitivity in making decisions significantly over time. Despite the extensive methods, available for teaching nursing ethics, the ethical empowerment program, adopted in this study, had long-lasting effects in terms of ameliorating the process of ethical decision-making in clinical situations. Conclusion: The ethical empowerment of nurses requires the adoption and application of proper methods and patterns of complying with nursing ethics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0969733018759830

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jamshidian, F., Shahriari, M., & Aderyani, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Qom University of Medical Science and Health Services (IR)
Corresponding author
Shahriari, Mohsen
Venue
Nursing Ethics
Published
2018-03-07
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
1256-1264
ISSN
  • 0969-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0989
OpenAlex
W2794387397
Cited by
44
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
ethical decision-making, intensive care unit nurses, intensive care unit, nursing ethics education, moral sensitivity
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Nurses, Power, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Critical Care Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review