Demystifying Sport Superstition
Abstract
The available information from sociology, anthropology, psychology and phys ical education as well as popular sport literature was studied in an attempt to throw light on the topic of superstition in sport. The paper attempts to summa rize the work done on the topic and, from the available facts, go on to suggest logical extensions of these ideas. It points out unanswered questions and raises doubts formerly unchallenged "facts". All indications are that superstition, in a variety of forms, is very common in sport although not always as obvious as some of the incidents described in sports columns might suggest. There are problems in investigating the subject and very little scientific research has been conducted. It appears that superstitions are natural psychological mechanisms helping the athlete to cope with the stress of the competitive situation and to perform at his best under pressure. There are theoretical answers as to where and how sports superstitions origi nate and under what conditions they persist. The level and extent of involvement of the athlete in his sport emerges a key determinant of the prevalence and seriousness with which superstition is endorsed. There are variations in super stition from one sport to another, and even with the roles assumed within a sport. There is some evidence of sex differences as well. Some good work has been done, but to date the research and theorizing on the topic has raised as many questions as it has answered.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pregame rituals of athletes have been shown to limit the number of anxious thoughts they experience by directing focus on completion of the ritual sequence.
“As a coping strategy, the pregame rituals of athletes have been shown to limit the number of anxious thoughts they experience by directing their focus on the completion of the ritual sequence instead.”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Neil, 1982
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boyer, P., & Liénard, P. (2006) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x06009332 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317734944 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
“This process is seen with athletic performances, particularly in high-stakes competitions where pressure and anxiety is high (Foster et al., 2006; Neil, 1982).”
Background
- Authors
- Neil, G. I.
- Corresponding author
- Neil, Graham I.
- Venue
- International Review of Sport Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-124
- ISSN
- 0074-7769 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055932825
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Review of Sport Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Keywords
- athlete behavior, performance under pressure, sport-specific differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review