Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Promoting human-centred AI in the workplace. Trade unions and their strategies for regulating the use of AI in Germany

Krzywdzinski, Martin, Gerst, Detlef, Butollo, Florian·2023·Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
DOI 10.1177/10242589221142273
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the world of work. For trade unions, the issue of how to regulate the use of AI is a central but difficult topic because the technology is still at an early stage and experience on its use limited. Focusing on Germany, this article addresses the following questions: (1) what areas of application and use cases for AI are relevant for trade unions and works councils?, (2) what role do trade union positions and demands play in the political discussion on regulating the use of AI?, (3) what strategies are trade unions using to influence the regulation and use of AI in the workplace?, and (4) what experiences are they gaining during this process? Reviewing trade union strategies, this article shows which concepts of human-centred AI the trade unions are trying to promote, how they try to ensure that works councils and trade unionists get appropriate training to understand the new technologies, and how dealing with AI is changing the way works councils work. The article also shows how the characteristics of the German system of industrial relations influence discussions on AI and the processes of implementing it in the workplace.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10242589221142273

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Acatech, 2015, Smart Maintenance für Smart Factories
  2. 10.5040/9781509953219 · DOI
  3. 10.17705/2msqe.00037 · DOI
  4. Autor D, 2020, The Work of the Future: Building Better Jobs in an Age of Intelligent Machines
  5. 10.5771/0342-300X-2018-3-174 · DOI
  6. Bales R, 2020, Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 41, 1
  7. Bitkom, 2021, Künstliche Intelligenz – Wo steht die deutsche Wirtschaft?
  8. BMWI, 2020, Einsatz von Künstlicher Intelligenz in der deutschen Wirtschaft
  9. 10.1177/1024258920918480 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/09596801211062556 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_3 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/978-3-662-57568-0_2 · DOI
  13. Daugherty PR, 2018, Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI
  14. 10.1007/978-3-658-23373-0_3 · DOI
  15. Deutscher Bundestag, 2020, Bericht der Enquete-Kommission Künstliche Intelligenz – Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung und wirtschaftliche, soziale und ökologische Potenziale
  16. DGB, 2020, Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) für gute Arbeit
  17. Fraunhofer-Allianz Big Data, 2017, Zukunftsmarkt Künstliche Intelligenz. Potentiale und Anwendungen
  18. 10.1007/s41358-021-00296-x · DOI
  19. 10.5771/0342-300X-2020-4-295 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/978-3-658-32276-2_3 · DOI
  21. Groshen E, 2019, Preparing U.S. Workers and Employers for an Autonomous Vehicle Future
  22. 10.1111/irj.12291 · DOI
  23. Harbecke T, 2020, Digitalisierungsstrategien im Portrait
  24. Herrmann C, 2022, Arbeitsrecht im Betrieb, 3, 43
  25. IG Metall, 2019, Kompass Digitalisierung
  26. 10.1007/s11077-022-09452-8 · DOI
  27. Kim P, 2021, Journal of Labor and Employment Law, 35, 289
  28. 10.1093/icc/dtab019 · DOI
  29. Krzywdzinski M, 2022, The growing gap between pioneers and laggards: Digitalisation, automation, and organisational change in the wake of the COVID-19-crisis in Germany
  30. 10.1332/273241721X16295434739161 · DOI
  31. Lechowski G, 2021, 33rd SASE annual meeting
  32. Lee K-F, 2018, AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order
  33. Leonard J, 2020, Autonomous Vehicles, Mobility, and Employment Policy: The Road Ahead
  34. McKinsey Global Institute, 2018, Notes From the Frontier. Modeling the Impact of AI on the World Economy
  35. Marcus G, 2019, Rebooting AI. Building Artificial Intelligence, we can Trust
  36. 10.1080/09617353.2016.1148923 · DOI
  37. Massolle J, 2021, Mehr Demokratie als Fundament der Mitbestimmung. Porträt Betriebsvereinbarungen
  38. 10.5771/0342-300X-2018-3-227 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/10580530.2020.1849465 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1007/978-3-030-22216-1_22 · DOI
  41. Müller-Jentsch W, 2003, The Changing Contours of German Industrial Relations, 39
  42. Niewerth C, 2022, Betriebsräte in der doppelten Transformation
  43. 10.3390/soc6020016 · DOI
  44. PWC, 2019, Künstliche Intelligenz in Unternehmen
  45. Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) and INPUT Consulting gGmbH, 2020, Künstliche Intelligenz. Ein sozialpartnerschaftliches Projekt untersucht die Arbeitswelt
  46. 10.1007/s11948-021-00340-7 · DOI
  47. Schröder W, 2016, Industrielle Beziehungen, 23, 374
  48. Tarafdar M, 2015, MIT Sloan Management Review, 56, 61
  49. The Federal Government, 2018, Artificial Intelligence Strategy
  50. 10.1177/1024258919876416 · DOI
  51. 10.25300/MISQ/2021/16559 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.2139/ssrn.3198546 · DOI
  53. Wahlster W, 2020, Deutsche Normungsroadmap KI
  54. 10.1515/arbeit-2017-0021 · DOI
  55. Zhang D, 2022, The AI Index 2022 Annual Report

Cited by

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Krzywdzinski, M., Gerst, D., & Butollo, F.
Affiliations
  • WZB Berlin Social Science Center and Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society, Germany
  • IG Metall, Frankfurt, Germany
  • Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society, Germany
Venue
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2022-12-23
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
53-70
ISSN
  • 1024-2589
  • 1996-7284
DOI
10.1177/10242589221142273
Cited by
43
References
4
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)
Funders
bundesministerium für bildung und forschung (16DII121)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.